Suppr超能文献

在德国疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)系统中,局部负压疗法能否作为一种具有成本效益的普通外科手术来实施?

[Can Topical Negative Pressure Therapy be Performed as a Cost-Effective General Surgery Procedure in the German DRG System?].

作者信息

Hirche Z, Xiong L, Hirche C, Willis S

机构信息

Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Unfallchirurgie, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Deutschland.

Klinik für Hand-, Plastische- und Rekonstruktive Chirurgie, Schwerbrandverletztenzentrum, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Ludwigshafen, Plastische und Handchirurgie an der Universität Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Deutschland.

出版信息

Zentralbl Chir. 2016 Apr;141(2):197-203. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1545866. Epub 2015 Jul 2.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Topical negative pressure therapy (TNPT) has been established for surgical wound therapy with different indications. Nevertheless, there is only sparse evidence regarding its therapeutic superiority or cost-effectiveness in the German DRG system (G-DRG). This study was designed to analyse the cost-effectiveness of TNPT in the G-DRG system with a focus on daily treatment costs and reimbursement in a general surgery care setting.

PATIENTS/MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included 176 patients, who underwent TNPT between 2007 and 2011 for general surgery indications. Analysis of the cost-effectiveness involved 149 patients who underwent a simulation to calculate the reimbursement with or without TNPT by a virtual control group in which the TNP procedure was withdrawn for DRG calculation. This was followed by a calculation of costs for wound dressings and TNPT rent and material costs. Comparison between the "true" and the virtual group enabled calculation of the effective remaining surplus per case.

RESULTS

Total reimbursement by included TNPT cases was 2,323 ,70.04 €. Costs for wound dressings and TNPT rent were 102,669.20 €. In 41 cases there was a cost-effectiveness (27.5%) with 607,422.03 € with TNP treatment, while the control group without TNP generated revenues of 442,015.10 €. Costs for wound dressings and TNPT rent were 47,376.68 €. In the final account we could generate a cost-effectiveness of 6759 € in 5 years per 149 patients by TNPT. In 108 cases there was no cost-effectiveness (72.5%).

CONCLUSION

TNPT applied in a representative general surgery setting allows for wound therapy without a major financial burden. Based on the costs for wound dressings and TNPT rent, a primarily medically based decision when to use TNPT can be performed in a balanced product cost accounting. This study does not analyse the superiority of TNPT in wound care, so further prospective studies are required which focus on therapeutic superiority and cost-effectiveness.

摘要

引言

局部负压疗法(TNPT)已被确立用于具有不同适应症的手术伤口治疗。然而,在德国诊断相关分组系统(G-DRG)中,关于其治疗优势或成本效益的证据却很稀少。本研究旨在分析G-DRG系统中TNPT的成本效益,重点关注普通外科护理环境中的每日治疗成本和报销情况。

患者/材料与方法:在这项回顾性研究中,我们纳入了2007年至2011年间因普通外科适应症接受TNPT治疗的176例患者。成本效益分析涉及149例患者,他们接受了模拟,通过虚拟对照组计算有或无TNPT时的报销情况,在虚拟对照组中,为进行DRG计算而取消了TNP程序。随后计算伤口敷料、TNPT租赁及材料成本。“真实”组与虚拟组之间的比较使得能够计算每例患者的有效剩余盈余。

结果

纳入的TNPT病例的总报销额为232370.04欧元。伤口敷料和TNPT租赁成本为102669.20欧元。41例患者具有成本效益(27.5%),接受TNP治疗的收入为607422.03欧元,而无TNP的对照组产生的收入为442015.10欧元。伤口敷料和TNPT租赁成本为47376.68欧元。最终核算显示,TNPT可为149例患者在5年内带来6759欧元的成本效益。108例患者无成本效益(72.5%)。

结论

在具有代表性的普通外科环境中应用TNPT可实现伤口治疗,且不会带来重大经济负担。基于伤口敷料和TNPT租赁成本,在平衡的产品成本核算中,可以做出关于何时使用TNPT的主要基于医学的决策。本研究未分析TNPT在伤口护理方面的优势,因此需要进一步开展专注于治疗优势和成本效益的前瞻性研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验