Yi Anthony, Villacis Diego, Yalamanchili Raj, Hatch George F Rick
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
Sports Health. 2015 Jul;7(4):326-34. doi: 10.1177/1941738115576729.
Despite the significant attention directed toward optimizing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, there has been less focus on rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair surgery.
To determine the effect of different rehabilitation protocols on clinical outcomes by comparing early versus late mobilization approaches and continuous passive mobilization (CPM) versus manual therapy after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
PubMed was searched for relevant articles using the keywords rotator cuff, rotator, cuff, tears, lacerations, and rehabilitation to identify articles published from January 1980 to March 2014.
Inclusion criteria consisted of articles of level 1 or 2 evidence, written in the English language, and with reported outcomes for early versus late mobilization or rehabilitation with CPM versus manual therapy after primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Exclusion criteria consisted of articles of level 3, 4, or 5 evidence, non-English language, and those with significantly different demographic variables between study groups. Included studies were evaluated with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials criteria.
Systematic review.
Level 2.
Level of evidence, study type, number of patients enrolled, number of patients at final follow-up, length of follow-up, age, sex, rotator cuff tear size, surgical technique, and concomitant operative procedures were extracted from included articles. Postoperative data included clinical outcome scores, visual analog score for pain, shoulder range of motion, strength, and rotator cuff retear rates.
A total of 7 studies met all criteria and were included in the final analysis. Five studies compared early and late mobilization. Two studies compared CPM and manual therapy.
In general, current data do not definitively demonstrate a significant difference between postoperative rotator cuff rehabilitation protocols that stress different timing of mobilization and use of CPM.
尽管在优化关节镜下肩袖修复方面受到了广泛关注,但肩袖修复手术后的康复治疗却较少受到关注。
通过比较关节镜下肩袖修复术后早期与晚期活动方法以及持续被动活动(CPM)与手法治疗,确定不同康复方案对临床结果的影响。
在PubMed上使用关键词“肩袖”“肩袖撕裂”“撕裂伤”和“康复”搜索相关文章,以识别1980年1月至2014年3月发表的文章。
纳入标准包括1级或2级证据的文章,用英语撰写,并且报告了初次关节镜下肩袖修复术后早期与晚期活动或CPM与手法治疗的康复结果。排除标准包括3级、4级或5级证据的文章、非英语文章以及研究组之间人口统计学变量有显著差异的文章。纳入的研究根据报告试验的统一标准进行评估。
系统评价。
2级。
从纳入的文章中提取证据水平、研究类型、纳入患者数量、最终随访时的患者数量、随访时间、年龄、性别、肩袖撕裂大小、手术技术和同期手术操作。术后数据包括临床结果评分、疼痛视觉模拟评分、肩关节活动范围、力量和肩袖再撕裂率。
共有7项研究符合所有标准并纳入最终分析。5项研究比较了早期和晚期活动。2项研究比较了CPM和手法治疗。
总体而言,目前的数据并未明确表明在强调不同活动时间和CPM使用的术后肩袖康复方案之间存在显著差异。