Suppr超能文献

[急诊科脓毒症患者中柏林新定义急性呼吸窘迫综合征的危险因素分析]

[Analysis of the risk factors of acute respiratory distress syndrome of Berlin new definition in patients with sepsis in emergency department].

作者信息

Qiao Liang, Liu Zhi

机构信息

Department of Emergency, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning, China. Corresponding author: Liu Zhi, Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Jul;27(7):558-62. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2015.07.004.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the risk factors of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients with sepsis in emergency department.

METHODS

312 patients with sepsis admitted to Department of Emergency of China Medical University Affiliated First Hospital were retrospectively analyzed, and they were divided into two groups according to development of ARDS, which was defined according to the Berlin new definition. The age, gender, vital signs, laboratory results, underlying disease, the mortality in emergency department sepsis (MEDS) score and lung injury prediction score (LIPS) were collected. Univariate analysis was done for each parameter. Statistical significance results were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to analyze the predictive value of the parameter for ARDS.

RESULTS

The incidence of sepsis-related ARDS was 11.2% (35/312). Within 35 cases of ARDS, there were 10 cases of mild ARDS, 18 cases of moderate ARDS, and 7 cases of severe ARDS. Univariate analysis showed that age (t=-2.134, P=0.035), oxygenation index (t=-4.245, P=0.001), arterial lactate (Lac, t=6.245, P<0.001), drugs for vascular diseases (χ2=4.261, P=0.026), shock (χ2=4.386, P=0.021), MEDS (t=4.021, P=0.045), LIPS (t=5.569, P<0.001), lung infections (χ2=4.289, P=0.025), and mechanical ventilation (χ2=6.245, P=0.001) were related to ARDS. The incidence of ARDS was different in different levels of Lac, which was 5.00% (3/16) at low level of Lac (<2.0 mmol/L), 9.46% (14/148) at middle level of Lac (2.0-3.9 mmol/L) and 17.31% (18/104) at high level of Lac (≥4.0 mmol/L). It was shown by multivariate logistic regression analysis that LIPS [ odds ratio (OR)=5.124, 95% confidence interval (95%CI)=3.642-10.153, P=0.002], Lac (OR=18.180, 95%CI=7.677-32.989, P<0.001) were independent risk factors for ARDS. It was shown by area under ROC (AUC) that the predictive value of LIPS and Lac in ARDS occurrence was significant. AUC of LIPS was 0.725, the cut-off value was 7, when LIPS≥7, the sensitivity was 71.0%, specificity was 75.6%. AUC of Lac was 0.793, the cut-off value was 4.2 mmol/L, when Lac≥4.2 mmol/L, the sensitivity was 72.1%, and specificity was 81.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

LIPS and Lac are independent risk factors of ARDS in patients with sepsis in emergency department, which may be a reference for the early clinical diagnosis of ARDS.

摘要

目的

探讨急诊科脓毒症患者发生急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的危险因素。

方法

回顾性分析中国医科大学附属第一医院急诊科收治的312例脓毒症患者,根据ARDS的发生情况按照柏林新定义将患者分为两组。收集患者的年龄、性别、生命体征、实验室检查结果、基础疾病、急诊科脓毒症死亡率(MEDS)评分及肺损伤预测评分(LIPS)。对各参数进行单因素分析。采用多因素logistic回归分析评估具有统计学意义的结果。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析各参数对ARDS的预测价值。

结果

脓毒症相关ARDS的发生率为11.2%(35/312)。在35例ARDS患者中,轻度ARDS 10例,中度ARDS 18例,重度ARDS 7例。单因素分析显示,年龄(t=-2.134,P=0.035)、氧合指数(t=-4.245,P=0.001)、动脉血乳酸(Lac,t=6.245,P<0.001)、血管疾病用药(χ2=4.261,P=0.026)、休克(χ2=4.386,P=0.021)、MEDS(t=4.021,P=0.045)、LIPS(t=5.569,P<0.001)、肺部感染(χ2=4.289,P=0.025)及机械通气(χ2=6.245,P=0.001)与ARDS相关。不同Lac水平的ARDS发生率不同,Lac低水平(<2.0 mmol/L)时ARDS发生率为5.00%(3/16),Lac中水平(2.03.9 mmol/L)时为9.46%(14/148),Lac高水平(≥4.0 mmol/L)时为17.31%(18/104)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,LIPS[比值比(OR)=5.124,95%置信区间(95%CI)=3.64210.153,P=0.002]、Lac(OR=18.180,95%CI=7.677~32.989,P<0.001)是ARDS的独立危险因素。ROC曲线下面积(AUC)显示,LIPS和Lac对ARDS发生的预测价值显著。LIPS的AUC为0.725,截断值为7,当LIPS≥7时,敏感度为71.0%,特异度为75.6%。Lac的AUC为0.793,截断值为4.2 mmol/L,当Lac≥4.2 mmol/L时,敏感度为72.1%,特异度为81.9%。

结论

LIPS和Lac是急诊科脓毒症患者发生ARDS的独立危险因素,可为ARDS的早期临床诊断提供参考。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验