Lyu Guangyu, Wang Xiaoyuan, Jiang Wenfang, Cai Tianbin, Zhang Youhua
Department of Intensive Care Unit, the People's Hospital of Liuzhou, Liuzhou 545006, Guangxi, China. Corresponding author: Wang Xiaoyuan, Email:
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 May;26(5):325-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.05.008.
To observe the clinical effects of early use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) in patients with severe sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
A prospective study was conducted. 96 patients with severe sepsis and ARDS admitted from July 2012 to September 2013 to intensive care unit (ICU) of Liuzhou People's Hospital in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region were enrolled and divided into severe ARDS group (n=48) and moderate ARDS group (n=48) according to the Berlin definition of ARDS. Then patients in each group were randomly divided into treatment group (n=24) and control group (n=24). All patients with diagnosis in accordance with the 2008 international septic shock and severe sepsis treatment guidelines were provided with comprehensive treatment and mechanical ventilation on the basis of analgesia and sedation. The patients in treatment group were given a loading dose of vecuronium during mechanical ventilation, started with 0.1 mg/kg up to 0.05 mg×kg(-1)×h(-1) for continuous intravenous infusion for 24-48 hours. The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHEII) score, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), arterial oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2), central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2), arterial blood lactate (Lac), C-reactive protein (CRP) levels of two groups were compared before treatment and 48 hours after treatment, and 21-day mortality rate was finally compared.
In moderate or severe ARDS group, there were no statistically significant difference in APACHEII score, SOFA score, PaO2/FiO2, ScvO2, Lac and CRP before treatment between two groups. APACHEII score, SOFA score, PaO2/FiO2, ScvO2, and Lac 48 hours after treatment were significantly improved in severe ARDS group compared with control group (APACHEII score: 16.58±2.41 vs. 19.79±3.52, t=3.679, P=0.010; SOFA score: 12.04±2.17 vs. 14.75±3.26, t=3.385, P=0.010; PaO2/FiO2: 159.31±22.57 mmHg vs. 131.81±34.93 mmHg, t=3.239, P=0.020; ScvO2: 0.673±0.068 vs. 0.572±0.142, t=3.137, P=0.030; Lac: 3.10±1.01 mmol/L vs. 4.39±1.72 mmol/L, t=3.161, P=0.030), while the value of CRP showed no significant difference (180.91±37.14 mg/L vs. 174.66±38.46 mg/L, t=0.572, P=0.570). 21-day mortality in treatment group was significantly lower than that in control group [20.8% (5/24) vs. 50.0% (12/24), χ(2)=4.463, P=0.035]. In moderate ARDS group, each of the above clinical parameters were improved in both groups expect for CRP at 48 hours after treatment, but the indexes showed no statistically significant difference between two groups (all P>0.05). 21-day mortality rate in the treatment group was slightly lower than that in the control group which showed no statistically significant difference [16.7% (4/24) vs. 25.0% (6/24), χ(2)=0.505, P=0.477].
The early use of NMBA treatment of patients with severe sepsis and severe ARDS cannot only improve the severity but also reduce 21-day mortality.
观察早期使用神经肌肉阻滞剂(NMBA)对严重脓毒症合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的临床疗效。
进行一项前瞻性研究。选取2012年7月至2013年9月入住广西壮族自治区柳州市人民医院重症监护病房(ICU)的96例严重脓毒症合并ARDS患者,根据ARDS的柏林定义分为重度ARDS组(n = 48)和中度ARDS组(n = 48)。然后将每组患者随机分为治疗组(n = 24)和对照组(n = 24)。所有符合2008年国际脓毒性休克和严重脓毒症治疗指南诊断的患者在镇痛和镇静的基础上给予综合治疗及机械通气。治疗组患者在机械通气期间给予维库溴铵负荷剂量,起始剂量为0.1 mg/kg,持续静脉输注剂量为0.05 mg×kg⁻¹×h⁻¹,持续24 - 48小时。比较两组治疗前及治疗48小时后的急性生理与慢性健康状况评分II(APACHEII)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、动脉氧合指数(PaO₂/FiO₂)、中心静脉血氧饱和度(ScvO₂)、动脉血乳酸(Lac)、C反应蛋白(CRP)水平,最后比较21天死亡率。
在重度或中度ARDS组中,两组治疗前APACHEII评分、SOFA评分、PaO₂/FiO₂、ScvO₂、Lac和CRP差异无统计学意义。与对照组相比,重度ARDS组治疗48小时后的APACHEII评分、SOFA评分、PaO₂/FiO₂、ScvO₂和Lac显著改善(APACHEII评分:16.58±2.41 vs. 19.79±3.52,t = 3.679,P = 0.010;SOFA评分:12.04±2.17 vs. 14.75±3.26,t = 3.385,P = 0.010;PaO₂/FiO₂:159.31±22.57 mmHg vs. 131.81±34.93 mmHg,t = 3.239,P = 0.020;ScvO₂:0.673±0.068 vs. 0.572±0.142,t = 3.137,P = 0.030;Lac:3.10±1.01 mmol/L vs. 4.39±1.72 mmol/L,t = 3.161,P = 0.030),而CRP值差异无统计学意义(180.91±37.14 mg/L vs. 174.66±38.46 mg/L,t = 0.572,P = 0.570)。治疗组21天死亡率显著低于对照组[20.8%(5/24)vs. 50.0%(12/24),χ² = 4.463,P = 0.035]。在中度ARDS组中,治疗48小时后除CRP外上述各临床参数两组均有改善,但两组指标差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。治疗组21天死亡率略低于对照组,差异无统计学意义[16.7%(4/24)vs. 25.0%(6/24),χ² = 0.505,P = 0.477]。
早期使用NMBA治疗严重脓毒症合并重度ARDS患者不仅可改善病情严重程度,还可降低21天死亡率。