Saydam Mehmet, Ozturk Bulent, Sinan Huseyin, Balta Ahmet Z, Demir Pervin, Ozer Mustafa T, Demirbas Sezai
Department of General Surgery, Ankara Mevki Military Hospital, Dıskapı, Ankara 061100, Turkey.
Department of General Surgery, Ankara Mevki Military Hospital, Dıskapı, Ankara 061100, Turkey.
Am J Surg. 2015 Oct;210(4):772-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.03.031. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
Although many options exist for surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease (PSD), consensus has not yet been achieved, as all surgical methods have various rates of complications, postoperative infection, and recurrence.
This study was a prospective, randomized, clinical trial, and was conducted with consecutive 100 patients admitted to Ankara Military Hospital General Surgery Service for treatment of PSD from May 2013 to August 2013. This study compared two surgical treatments for PSD: modified Limberg flap transposition and lateral advancement flap transposition with Burow's triangle. The patients received surgical treatment with either modified Limberg flap transposition (n = 50) or lateral advancement flap transposition with Burow's triangle (n = 50). Clinical healing period, length of hospital stay, operative time, postoperative complications including recurrence, wound dehiscence, and surgical site infection, as noted during postoperative follow-up period; Visual Analog Scale scores for pain.
The mean follow-up period was 12 months. No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in length of hospital stay (P = .515), operative time (P = .175), wound dehiscence (P = .645), and Visual Analog Scale pain scores (P = .112). The mean operative times were 42.5 minutes in the modified Limberg group and 40.0 minutes in the lateral advancement group.
Although lateral advancement flap transposition with Burow's triangle is used less often than modified Limberg flap transposition, we could not determine a parameter that was statistically different such as operative time, postoperative complication, or the length of hospital stay. Hence, the lateral advancement flap is as viable an option as other more preferable techniques in the treatment of PSD, which particularly settled on the upper segment without a deep natal cleft.
尽管藏毛窦疾病(PSD)的手术治疗有多种选择,但由于所有手术方法都有不同的并发症、术后感染和复发率,尚未达成共识。
本研究是一项前瞻性、随机临床试验,对2013年5月至2013年8月连续收治于安卡拉军事医院普通外科接受PSD治疗的100例患者进行。本研究比较了PSD的两种手术治疗方法:改良Limberg皮瓣转移术和带Burow三角的外侧推进皮瓣转移术。患者接受改良Limberg皮瓣转移术(n = 50)或带Burow三角的外侧推进皮瓣转移术(n = 50)进行手术治疗。记录术后随访期间的临床愈合期、住院时间、手术时间、术后并发症(包括复发、伤口裂开和手术部位感染);疼痛视觉模拟量表评分。
平均随访期为12个月。两组在住院时间(P = 0.515)、手术时间(P = 0.175)、伤口裂开(P = 0.645)和视觉模拟量表疼痛评分(P = 0.112)方面均未观察到显著差异。改良Limberg组的平均手术时间为42.5分钟,外侧推进组为40.0分钟。
尽管带Burow三角的外侧推进皮瓣转移术的使用频率低于改良Limberg皮瓣转移术,但我们无法确定手术时间、术后并发症或住院时间等有统计学差异的参数。因此,在PSD的治疗中,外侧推进皮瓣与其他更常用的技术一样是可行的选择,尤其适用于上段无深骶尾部裂的情况。