Suppr超能文献

改良 Karydakis 皮瓣与改良 Limberg 皮瓣治疗藏毛窦病的短期疗效比较:一项随机对照研究。

Comparison of short-term results between the modified Karydakis flap and the modified Limberg flap in the management of pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled study.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Apr;56(4):491-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31828006f7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The modified Karydakis flap and the modified Limberg flap are commonly used in the surgical management of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to compare short- term results of these techniques.

DESIGN

The modified Karydakis flap and the modified Limberg flap were compared in a randomized controlled trial.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted in the day-case surgery department of a large academic teaching hospital in Alexandria, Egypt, from February 2009 through September 2011.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing surgery for chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease were eligible for the study. Patients with sepsis were eligible only after aggressive treatment to eliminate sepsis.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly allocated to undergo surgery with either the modified Karydakis flap or the modified Limberg flap.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary end point was operative time. Secondary endpoints included proportion of patients with postoperative complications, proportion of patients who were satisfied with the cosmetic results, and the rate of recurrence.

LIMITATIONS

Follow-up times were not sufficient to evaluate long-term recurrence rates.

RESULTS

Of 154 patients screened, 125 were enrolled, and 120 patients completed the study. The median operative time was significantly shorter in patients with the modified Karydakis flap than in those with the modified Limberg flap: 33 (range, 28-40) min vs 52 (range, 48-62) min; p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between study groups regarding overall complication rate (23% vs 40%, p = 0.08), wound infection (3% vs 5%, p > 0.99), subcutaneous fluid collection (5% vs 0%, p = 0.24), or hypoesthesia (10% vs 23%, p = 0.09). Full-thickness wound disruption was encountered in 9 patients (15%) in the modified Limberg group vs no patient in the modified Karydakis group (p = 0.003). The median follow-up duration was 20.5 months in each study group. One patient (2%) in the modified Karydakis group developed recurrent disease vs 2 patients (3%) in the modified Limberg group (p > 0.99). In the modified Karydakis group, 58 patients (97%) were satisfied with the cosmetic outcome and were willing to recommend the operation to others vs 43 patients (72%) in the modified Limberg group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques provide effective treatment for pilonidal sinus disease and can be performed safely as day-case surgery. The modified Karydakis flap is associated with significantly shorter operative time, a lower full-thickness wound disruption rate, and a higher patient satisfaction rate.

摘要

背景

改良 Karydakis 皮瓣和改良 Limberg 皮瓣常用于骶尾部藏毛窦疾病的手术治疗。

目的

比较这两种技术的短期效果。

设计

改良 Karydakis 皮瓣和改良 Limberg 皮瓣在一项随机对照试验中进行了比较。

地点

该研究在埃及亚历山大的一家大型学术教学医院的日间手术部门进行,时间为 2009 年 2 月至 2011 年 9 月。

患者

接受慢性骶尾部藏毛窦疾病手术的患者符合研究条件。患有败血症的患者只有在积极治疗消除败血症后才有资格接受手术。

干预措施

患者被随机分配接受改良 Karydakis 皮瓣或改良 Limberg 皮瓣手术。

主要观察指标

主要终点是手术时间。次要终点包括术后并发症患者比例、对美容效果满意的患者比例和复发率。

局限性

随访时间不足以评估长期复发率。

结果

在筛选出的 154 名患者中,有 125 名患者入组,120 名患者完成了研究。改良 Karydakis 皮瓣组的中位手术时间明显短于改良 Limberg 皮瓣组:33(范围,28-40)min 比 52(范围,48-62)min;p < 0.001)。两组患者的总体并发症发生率(23%比 40%,p = 0.08)、伤口感染(3%比 5%,p > 0.99)、皮下积液(5%比 0%,p = 0.24)或感觉迟钝(10%比 23%,p = 0.09)无显著差异。改良 Limberg 组有 9 名(15%)患者发生全层伤口破裂,而改良 Karydakis 组无患者发生(p = 0.003)。改良 Karydakis 组和改良 Limberg 组的中位随访时间分别为 20.5 个月。改良 Karydakis 组有 1 名(2%)患者发生疾病复发,改良 Limberg 组有 2 名(3%)患者发生疾病复发(p > 0.99)。在改良 Karydakis 组中,58 名(97%)患者对美容效果满意,并愿意向他人推荐该手术,而在改良 Limberg 组中,有 43 名(72%)患者对美容效果满意(p < 0.001)。

结论

两种技术均可有效治疗藏毛窦疾病,可安全作为日间手术进行。改良 Karydakis 皮瓣的手术时间明显更短,全层伤口破裂率更低,患者满意度更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验