Chen Qi, Yan Guoquan, Zhang Xiangmin
Department of Chemistry, Fudan University, No. 220 Handan Rd., Shanghai, 200433, China.
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2015 Aug 15;29(15):1389-94. doi: 10.1002/rcm.7230.
Analyzing the proteome on the scale of only several hundred cells with mass spectrometry has great significance for applications with limited sample amounts. We applied multiple proteases to the direct digestion of cells and compared the identified proteins both qualitatively and quantitatively.
Three hundred cells were directly digested by trypsin, chymotrypsin, or the combination of trypsin and chymotrypsin. The peptides were identified using a LTQ-Orbitrap XL, and data were analyzed using MaxQuant software.
Different proteases produced different identified protein numbers. Trypsin proved to be the best choice for generating the largest protein number, while other proteases complemented the identification results of trypsin by increasing protein sequence coverage. Concerning the quantitative perspective, using trypsin would produce the biggest number of proteins quantifiable by intensity-based absolute quantification (iBAQ).
When hundred-scale cell samples are analyzed, an optimum choice of proteases should be made to realize different analytical objectives.
利用质谱技术在仅几百个细胞的规模上分析蛋白质组,对于样本量有限的应用具有重要意义。我们应用多种蛋白酶对细胞进行直接消化,并对鉴定出的蛋白质进行定性和定量比较。
用胰蛋白酶、糜蛋白酶或胰蛋白酶与糜蛋白酶的组合直接消化300个细胞。使用LTQ-Orbitrap XL鉴定肽段,并使用MaxQuant软件分析数据。
不同的蛋白酶鉴定出的蛋白质数量不同。胰蛋白酶被证明是产生最大蛋白质数量的最佳选择,而其他蛋白酶通过增加蛋白质序列覆盖率补充了胰蛋白酶的鉴定结果。从定量角度来看,使用胰蛋白酶将产生基于强度的绝对定量(iBAQ)可定量的最大蛋白质数量。
在分析数百规模的细胞样本时,应做出蛋白酶的最佳选择以实现不同的分析目标。