Andrews Christina, Grogan Colleen M, Brennan Marianne, Pollack Harold A
Christina Andrews is an assistant professor in the College of Social Work, University of South Carolina, in Columbia.
Colleen M. Grogan (
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jul;34(7):1131-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0151.
Over the past fifty years Medicaid has taken divergent paths in financing mental health and addiction treatment. In mental health, Medicaid became the dominant source of funding and had a profound impact on the organization and delivery of services. But it played a much more modest role in addiction treatment. This is poised to change, as the Affordable Care Act is expected to dramatically expand Medicaid's role in financing addiction services. In this article we consider the different paths these two treatment systems have taken since 1965 and identify strategic lessons that the addiction treatment system might take from mental health's experience under Medicaid. These lessons include leveraging optional coverage categories to tailor Medicaid to the unique needs of the addiction treatment system, providing incentives to addiction treatment programs to create and deliver high-quality alternatives to inpatient treatment, and using targeted Medicaid licensure standards to increase the quality of addiction services.
在过去五十年里,医疗补助计划在为心理健康和成瘾治疗提供资金方面走上了不同的道路。在心理健康领域,医疗补助计划成为了主要的资金来源,并对服务的组织和提供产生了深远影响。但它在成瘾治疗方面所起的作用则小得多。这种情况有望改变,因为《平价医疗法案》预计将大幅扩大医疗补助计划在为成瘾服务提供资金方面的作用。在本文中,我们考察了自1965年以来这两种治疗体系所走过的不同道路,并确定了成瘾治疗体系可以从医疗补助计划下心理健康领域的经验中汲取的战略教训。这些教训包括利用可选的保险类别,使医疗补助计划适应成瘾治疗体系的独特需求;为成瘾治疗项目提供激励措施,以创建并提供高质量的住院治疗替代方案;以及采用有针对性的医疗补助许可标准来提高成瘾服务的质量。