Knudsen Hannah K, Studts Jamie L
a Associate Professor, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research , University of Kentucky , Lexington , KY , USA.
b Associate Professor, Department of Behavioral Science , University of Kentucky , Lexington , KY , USA.
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2017 Apr-Jun;49(2):111-121. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2017.1295335. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) has been heralded as a major policy change that is expected to transform the delivery of substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. Few studies have reported on the perceived impacts of ACA from the perspectives of SUD treatment providers, such as physicians who prescribe buprenorphine to patients with opioid use disorder. The present study describes buprenorphine prescribers' perceptions regarding impacts of the ACA on the delivery of buprenorphine and examines whether state-level approaches to implementing ACA are associated with its perceived impacts. Data are drawn from a national sample of current buprenorphine prescribers (n = 1,174) who were surveyed by mail. On average, buprenorphine prescribers reported ambivalence regarding the impacts of the ACA, as indicated by a mean of 2.75 (SD = 0.69) on a scale that ranged from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 5 ("strongly agree"). A multi-level mixed-effects regression model indicated that physicians practicing in states that were supportive of ACA, as indicated by adopting both the Medicaid expansion and implementing a state-based health insurance exchange, had more positive perceptions of the ACA than physicians in states that had declined both of these policies. This study suggests that state approaches to ACA may be associated with varied impacts.
《平价医疗法案》(ACA)被誉为一项重大政策变革,有望改变物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗的提供方式。很少有研究从SUD治疗提供者的角度报告ACA的感知影响,比如为阿片类药物使用障碍患者开丁丙诺啡的医生。本研究描述了丁丙诺啡开处方者对ACA对丁丙诺啡提供的影响的看法,并考察了州一级实施ACA的方式是否与其感知影响相关。数据来自通过邮件调查的当前丁丙诺啡开处方者的全国样本(n = 1174)。平均而言,丁丙诺啡开处方者对ACA的影响表示矛盾,在从1(“强烈不同意”)到5(“强烈同意”)的量表上,平均分为2.75(标准差 = 0.69)。一个多层次混合效应回归模型表明,在既采用医疗补助扩大又实施基于州的医疗保险交易所,从而表明支持ACA的州执业的医生,对ACA的看法比在两项政策都拒绝的州的医生更积极。这项研究表明,州一级实施ACA的方式可能会带来不同的影响。