1Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 2Department of Neurosurgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 3Department of Critical Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 4Department of Intensive Care, Neurocritical Care Unit, Hospital Sao Joao, Porto, Portugal.
Crit Care Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):1952-63. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001165.
Recently, a concept of an individually targeted level of cerebral perfusion pressure that aims to restore impaired cerebral vasoreactivity has been advocated after traumatic brain injury. The relationship between cerebral perfusion pressure and pressure reactivity index normally is supposed to have a U-shape with its minimum interpreted as the value of "optimal" cerebral perfusion pressure. The aim of this study is to investigate the relation between the absence of the optimal cerebral perfusion pressure curve and physiological variables, clinical factors, and interventions.
Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.
Neurocritical care units in two university centers.
Between May 2012 and December 2013, a total of 48 traumatic brain injury patients were studied with real-time annotation of predefined clinical events.
None.
All patients had continuous monitoring of arterial blood pressure, intracranial pressure, and cerebral perfusion pressure, with real-time calculations of pressure reactivity index and optimal cerebral perfusion pressure using ICM+ software (Cambridge Enterprise, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK). Selected clinical events were inserted on a daily basis, including changes in physiological variables, sedativeanalgesic drugs, vasoactive drugs, and medical/surgical therapies for intracranial hypertension. The collected data were divided into 4-hour periods, with the primary outcome being absence of the optimal cerebral perfusion pressure curve. For every period, mean values (± SDs) of arterial blood pressure, intracranial pressure, pressure reactivity index, and other physiological variables were calculated; clinical events were organized using predefined scales. In 28% of all 1,561 periods, an optimal cerebral perfusion pressure curve was absent. A generalized linear mixed model with binary logistic regression was fitted. Absence of slow arterial blood pressure waves (odds ratio, 2.7; p < 0.001), higher pressure reactivity index values (odds ratio, 2.9; p < 0.001), lower amount of sedative-analgesic drugs (odds ratio, 1.9; p = 0.03), higher vasoactive medication dose (odds ratio, 3.2; p = 0.02), no administration of maintenance neuromuscular blockers (odds ratio, 1.7; p < 0.01), and following decompressive craniectomy (odds ratio, 1.8; p < 0.01) were independently associated with optimal cerebral perfusion pressure curve absence.
This study identified six factors that were independently associated with absence of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure curves.
最近,有人提出了一种针对个体脑灌注压水平的概念,旨在恢复创伤性脑损伤后的受损脑血管反应性。脑灌注压和压力反应性指数之间的关系通常呈 U 形,其最小值被解释为“最佳”脑灌注压的值。本研究旨在探讨最佳脑灌注压曲线缺失与生理变量、临床因素和干预措施的关系。
前瞻性收集数据的回顾性分析。
两所大学中心的神经重症监护病房。
2012 年 5 月至 2013 年 12 月,共对 48 例创伤性脑损伤患者进行了研究,并对预先设定的临床事件进行实时注释。
无。
所有患者均连续监测动脉血压、颅内压和脑灌注压,使用 ICM+软件(英国剑桥大学剑桥企业)实时计算压力反应性指数和最佳脑灌注压。每天插入选定的临床事件,包括生理变量、镇静镇痛药物、血管活性药物以及颅内压升高的治疗方法的变化。收集的数据分为 4 小时时段,主要结果是最佳脑灌注压曲线缺失。对于每个时间段,计算平均动脉血压、颅内压、压力反应性指数和其他生理变量的值(平均值±标准差);使用预定的量表对临床事件进行组织。在所有 1561 个时间段中的 28%,没有最佳脑灌注压曲线。采用二元逻辑回归广义线性混合模型进行拟合。缓慢动脉血压波缺失(优势比,2.7;p < 0.001)、较高的压力反应性指数值(优势比,2.9;p < 0.001)、较低的镇静镇痛药物用量(优势比,1.9;p = 0.03)、较高的血管活性药物剂量(优势比,3.2;p = 0.02)、未使用维持性神经肌肉阻滞剂(优势比,1.7;p < 0.01)和去骨瓣减压术(优势比,1.8;p < 0.01)与最佳脑灌注压曲线缺失独立相关。
本研究确定了与最佳脑灌注压曲线缺失独立相关的六个因素。