Brain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Neuroanesthesia Division, Anesthesiology Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2024 Jun;38(3):649-662. doi: 10.1007/s10877-023-01115-0. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
Poor postoperative outcomes may be associated with cerebral ischaemia or hyperaemia, caused by episodes of arterial blood pressure (ABP) being outside the range of cerebral autoregulation (CA). Monitoring CA using COx (correlation between slow changes in mean ABP and regional cerebral O saturation-rSO) could allow to individualise the management of ABP to preserve CA. We aimed to explore a continuous automated assessment of ABP (ABP where CA is best preserved) and ABP at the lower limit of autoregulation (LLA) in elective neurosurgery patients. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 85 patients [median age 60 (IQR 51-68)] undergoing elective neurosurgery. ABP was the mean of 3 pre-operative non-invasive measurements. ABP and rSO waveforms were processed to estimate COx-derived ABP and LLA trend-lines. We assessed: availability (number of patients where ABP/LLA were available); time required to achieve first values; differences between ABP/LLA and ABP. ABP and LLA availability was 86 and 89%. Median (IQR) time to achieve the first value was 97 (80-155) and 93 (78-122) min for ABP and LLA respectively. Median ABP [75 (69-84)] was lower than ABP [90 (84-95)] (p < 0.001, Mann-U test). Patients spent 72 (56-86) % of recorded time with ABP above or below ABP ± 5 mmHg. ABP and ABP time trends and variability were not related to each other within patients. 37.6% of patients had at least 1 hypotensive insult (ABP < LLA) during the monitoring time. It seems possible to assess individualised automated ABP targets during elective neurosurgery.
术后结果不佳可能与脑缺血或充血有关,这是由动脉血压(ABP)超出脑自动调节(CA)范围的发作引起的。使用 COx(平均 ABP 与局部脑氧饱和度之间的缓慢变化的相关性-rSO)监测 CA,可以允许将 ABP 管理个性化以维持 CA。我们旨在探索对择期神经外科患者进行连续自动评估最佳 ABP(CA 保持最佳的 ABP)和自动调节下限(LLA)的 ABP。回顾性分析了 85 例接受择期神经外科手术的患者[中位年龄 60(IQR 51-68)]前瞻性收集的数据。ABP 是 3 次术前非侵入性测量的平均值。处理 ABP 和 rSO 波形以估计 COx 衍生的 ABP 和 LLA 趋势线。我们评估了:可获得性(可获得 ABP/LLA 的患者数量);达到第一个值所需的时间;ABP/LLA 与 ABP 之间的差异。ABP 和 LLA 的可用性分别为 86%和 89%。达到第一个值的中位数(IQR)时间分别为 ABP 97(80-155)和 LLA 93(78-122)分钟。ABP 的中位数[75(69-84)]低于 ABP [90(84-95)](p < 0.001,Mann-U 检验)。患者在记录的时间内有 72(56-86)%的时间 ABP 高于或低于 ABP ± 5 mmHg。患者之间 ABP 及其时间趋势和变异性彼此之间没有关系。37.6%的患者在监测期间至少发生了 1 次低血压损伤(ABP < LLA)。在择期神经外科手术期间,评估个体化自动 ABP 目标似乎是可行的。