Lee Sang-Jae, Kwon Wooil, Kang Mee Joo, Jang Jin-Young, Chang Ye Rim, Jung Woohyun, Kim Sun-Whe
Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2014 Feb;18(1):1-8. doi: 10.14701/kjhbps.2014.18.1.1. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Little is known about clinical features and survival outcome in locally advanced unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHC). The aim was to investigate the clinical features and the survival outcome in these patients, and to evaluate the role of palliative resections in locally advanced unresectable EHC.
Between 1995 and 2007, 280 patients with locally advanced unresectable EHC were identified. Clinical, pathologic, and survival data were investigated. A comparative analysis was done between those who received palliative resection (PR) and those who were not operated on (NR).
The overall median survival of the study population was 10±1 months, and the 3- and 5-year survival rates (YSR) were 8.5% and 2.5%, respectively. The median survival, 3- and 5-YSR of PR were 23 months, 32.1% and 13.1%, respectively. For NR, they were 9 months, 3.9% and 0%, which were significantly worse than PR (p<0.001). In univariate analysis, T classification, N classification, tumor location, palliative resection, adjuvant treatment, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy were factors that showed survival difference between PR and NR. Regional lymph node metastasis (RR, 2.084; 95% CI, 1.491-2.914; p<0.001), non-resections (RR, 2.270; 95% CI, 1.497-3.443; p<0.001), and no chemotherapy (RR, 1.604; 95% CI, 1.095-2.349; p=0.015) were identified as risk factors for poor outcome on multivariate analysis.
Without evidence of systemic disease, palliative resection may provide some survival benefit in selected locally advanced unresectable EHCs and adjuvant treatment may further improve survival outcome.
背景/目的:关于局部晚期不可切除肝外胆管癌(EHC)的临床特征和生存结局,人们了解甚少。本研究旨在探讨这些患者的临床特征和生存结局,并评估姑息性切除术在局部晚期不可切除EHC中的作用。
1995年至2007年间,共纳入280例局部晚期不可切除EHC患者。对其临床、病理和生存数据进行调查。对接受姑息性切除术(PR)的患者和未接受手术(NR)的患者进行对比分析。
研究人群的总体中位生存期为10±1个月,3年和5年生存率(YSR)分别为8.5%和2.5%。PR组的中位生存期、3年和5年YSR分别为23个月、32.1%和13.1%。NR组分别为9个月、3.9%和0%,明显差于PR组(p<0.001)。单因素分析显示,T分期、N分期、肿瘤位置、姑息性切除术、辅助治疗、化疗和放疗是PR组和NR组生存存在差异的因素。多因素分析确定区域淋巴结转移(RR,2.084;95%CI,1.491 - 2.914;p<0.001)、未行手术(RR,2.270;95%CI,1.497 - 3.443;p<0.001)和未进行化疗(RR,1.604;95%CI,1.095 - 2.349;p = 0.015)是预后不良的危险因素。
在无全身疾病证据的情况下,姑息性切除术可能为部分局部晚期不可切除EHC患者带来一定生存获益,辅助治疗可能进一步改善生存结局。