• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝门周围胆管癌的总生存:以治愈为目的的 R1 切除术与初始内镜治疗的比较。

Overall survival peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma: R1 resection with curative intent compared to primary endoscopic therapy.

机构信息

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2012 Jan;105(1):91-6. doi: 10.1002/jso.22054. Epub 2011 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1002/jso.22054
PMID:21815152
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients with peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma who undergo R1 resection with curative intent will have an improved survival compared to patients who were not resected.

METHODS

Review of a prospective hepatobiliary database identified 130 patients. Survival was compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients (61%) were resected while 51 (49%) patients were not. Forty-two patients (54%) had an R0 resection. There was no difference in mean age (69 vs. 67; P = 0.8), BMI (27.8 vs. 27.9; P = 1.0), gender (73% vs. 43% male; P = 0.1), presence of jaundice (77% vs. 64%; P = 0.5), vascular involvement on pre operative imaging (77% vs. 64%; P = 0.5), stent (73.1% vs. 64.3%; P = 0.72), and lobar atrophy (27% vs. 7%, P = 0.2) in the resected versus non-resected patients. All patients underwent chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. After a median follow up of 35.6 months the median OSl for all peri-hilar patients was 16.2 months (95% CI = 11.2-23.4). The median OS for resected patients was 18.9 months (95% CI = 12.5-24.7) versus 5.0 months (95% CI = 0-6.9) for patients not resected (P < 0.001). The only pre-operative predictor of OS was resection (P = 0.041). Vascular invasion, lobar atrophy, and stent placement were not statistically significant predictors.

CONCLUSION

Overall survival is improved in patients undergoing R1 resection and multi-modality therapy compared to patients not resected.

摘要

背景与目的

接受根治性 R1 切除术的肝门周围胆管癌患者的生存情况优于未接受切除术的患者。

方法

回顾性分析前瞻性肝胆数据库中确定的 130 例患者。采用对数秩检验比较生存情况。

结果

79 例(61%)患者接受了切除术,51 例(49%)患者未接受切除术。42 例(54%)患者行 R0 切除术。两组患者的平均年龄(69 岁比 67 岁;P=0.8)、BMI(27.8 比 27.9;P=1.0)、性别(73%比 43%为男性;P=0.1)、术前影像学检查中是否存在黄疸(77%比 64%;P=0.5)、血管受累(77%比 64%;P=0.5)、支架(73.1%比 64.3%;P=0.72)和肝叶萎缩(27%比 7%,P=0.2)差异均无统计学意义。所有患者均接受了化疗和/或放疗。中位随访 35.6 个月后,所有肝门周围胆管癌患者的中位总生存率为 16.2 个月(95%CI=11.2-23.4)。接受切除术患者的中位总生存期为 18.9 个月(95%CI=12.5-24.7),而未接受切除术患者的中位总生存期为 5.0 个月(95%CI=0-6.9)(P<0.001)。唯一与 OS 相关的术前预测因素是切除术(P=0.041)。血管侵犯、肝叶萎缩和支架置入不是统计学上的显著预测因素。

结论

与未接受切除术的患者相比,接受 R1 切除术和多模式治疗的患者总生存率提高。

相似文献

1
Overall survival peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma: R1 resection with curative intent compared to primary endoscopic therapy.肝门周围胆管癌的总生存:以治愈为目的的 R1 切除术与初始内镜治疗的比较。
J Surg Oncol. 2012 Jan;105(1):91-6. doi: 10.1002/jso.22054. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
2
Additional resection of an intraoperative margin-positive proximal bile duct improves survival in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.术中近端胆管切缘阳性的额外切除可改善肝门部胆管癌患者的生存。
Ann Surg. 2011 Nov;254(5):776-81; discussion 781-3. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182368f85.
3
The impact of portal vein resection on outcomes for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis of 305 cases.门静脉切除对肝门部胆管癌预后的影响:305 例多机构分析。
Cancer. 2012 Oct 1;118(19):4737-47. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27492. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
4
Influence of hepatic resection margin on recurrence and survival in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.肝切除切缘对肝内胆管癌复发和生存的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Oct;15(10):2787-94. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0081-1. Epub 2008 Aug 7.
5
Hepatectomy with portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: audit of 52 consecutive cases.肝门部胆管癌门静脉切除肝切除术:52例连续病例分析
Ann Surg. 2003 Nov;238(5):720-7. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000094437.68038.a3.
6
Resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: concomitant liver resection decreases hepatic recurrence.肝门部胆管癌切除术:同期肝切除可降低肝内复发率。
Ann Surg. 2008 Aug;248(2):273-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817f2bfd.
7
Long-term outcome and prognostic factors of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma involving the hepatic hilus versus hilar cholangiocarcinoma after curative-intent resection: Should they be recognized as perihilar cholangiocarcinoma or differentiated?肝门部胆管癌累及肝门部与肝门部胆管癌根治性切除术后的长期预后和预后因素:是否应将其视为肝门周围胆管癌或加以区分?
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov;45(11):2173-2179. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.06.014. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
8
Staging, resectability, and outcome in 225 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.225例肝门部胆管癌患者的分期、可切除性及预后
Ann Surg. 2001 Oct;234(4):507-17; discussion 517-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200110000-00010.
9
Intrahepatic, peri-hilar and distal cholangiocarcinoma: Three different locations of the same tumor or three different tumors?肝内、肝门周围及肝外胆管癌:同一肿瘤的三个不同部位还是三种不同肿瘤?
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep;41(9):1162-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.05.013. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
10
Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the new era: the Asan experience.新时代肝门部胆管癌的外科治疗: 来自首尔峨山医院的经验。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010 Jul;17(4):476-89. doi: 10.1007/s00534-009-0204-5. Epub 2009 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventional Radiology Locoregional Therapies for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.肝内胆管癌的介入放射学局部治疗
Life (Basel). 2024 Feb 2;14(2):217. doi: 10.3390/life14020217.
2
Effectiveness of additional resection of the invasive cancer-positive proximal bile duct margin in cases of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.肝门部胆管癌病例中对浸润癌阳性近端胆管切缘进行额外切除的有效性。
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2018 Aug;7(4):251-269. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2018.03.14.
3
Dose escalation of radiotherapy in unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
不可切除的肝外胆管癌的放疗剂量递增。
Cancer Med. 2018 Oct;7(10):4880-4892. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1734. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
4
Transparenchymal glissonean approach: a novel surgical technique for advanced perihilar bile duct cancer.经实质肝门入路:一种治疗晚期肝门部胆管癌的新型手术技术。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 May;403(3):387-394. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1633-2. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
5
Locoregional Therapies of Cholangiocarcinoma.胆管癌的局部区域治疗
Visc Med. 2016 Dec;32(6):414-420. doi: 10.1159/000453010. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
6
Intrahepatic, perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinoma: Management and outcomes.肝内、肝门周围及肝外胆管癌:治疗与预后
Ann Hepatol. 2017;16(1):133-139. doi: 10.5604/16652681.1226927.
7
Clinical features and survival outcome of locally advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.局部晚期肝外胆管癌的临床特征与生存结局
Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2014 Feb;18(1):1-8. doi: 10.14701/kjhbps.2014.18.1.1. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
8
A modified Jarnagin-Blumgart classification better predicts survival for resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma.一种改良的贾纳金-布卢姆加特分类法能更好地预测可切除肝门部胆管癌的生存率。
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Mar 11;13:99. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0526-5.
9
Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: controversies on the extent of surgical resection aiming at cure.肝门部胆管癌:旨在治愈的手术切除范围的争议
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Feb;30(2):159-71. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-2063-z. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
10
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: Current therapy.肝门部胆管癌:当前的治疗方法。
World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2014 Aug 15;5(3):344-54. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.v5.i3.344.