Hosseini Seyed Masoud, Amery Hamideh, Emadzadeh Ali, Babazadeh Saber
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Feb 24;7(5):152-8. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n5p152.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: In recent decades, many studies have been carried out on the importance of Kolb experiential learning theory (ELT) in teaching-learning processes and its effect on learning outcomes. However, some experts have criticized the Kolb theory and argue that there are some ambiguities on the validity of the theory as an important predictor of achievement. This study has been carried out on dental students' educational achievement in relation to their dominant learning styles based on Kolb theory in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (Iran).
In a cross sectional study, Kolb Learning Style Inventory (LSI Ver. 3.1) as well as a questionnaire containing students' demographic data, academic achievement marks including grade point average (GPA), theoretical and practical courses marks, and the comprehensive basic sciences exam (CBSE) scores were administered on a purposive sample of 162 dental students who had passed their comprehensive basic sciences exam. Educational achievement data were analyzed in relation to students' dominant learning styles, using descriptive and analytical statistics including χ2, Kruskal-Wallis and two-way ANOVA tests.
The dominant learning styles of students were Assimilating (53.1%), Converging (24.1%), Diverging (14.2%) and Accommodating (8.6%). Although, the students with Assimilating and Converging learning styles had a better performance on their educational achievement, there was no significant relationship between educational achievement and dominant learning style (P≥0.05).
Findings support that the dominant learning style is not exclusively an essential factor to predict educational achievement. Rather, it shows learning preferences of students that may be considered in designing learning opportunities by the teachers.
近几十年来,人们针对科尔布经验学习理论(ELT)在教学过程中的重要性及其对学习成果的影响开展了许多研究。然而,一些专家批评了科尔布理论,并认为该理论作为成绩的重要预测指标,其有效性存在一些模糊之处。本研究基于科尔布理论,对伊朗马什哈德医科大学牙科专业学生的教育成绩与其主导学习风格之间的关系进行了研究。
在一项横断面研究中,对162名通过综合基础科学考试的牙科专业学生进行了目的性抽样,让他们填写科尔布学习风格量表(LSI Ver. 3.1)以及一份包含学生人口统计学数据、学业成绩分数(包括平均绩点(GPA)、理论和实践课程分数)和综合基础科学考试(CBSE)成绩的问卷。使用描述性和分析性统计方法(包括χ2检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验和双向方差分析),分析教育成绩数据与学生主导学习风格之间的关系。
学生的主导学习风格为同化型(53.1%)、聚合型(24.1%)、发散型(14.2%)和顺应型(8.6%)。尽管同化型和聚合型学习风格的学生在学业成绩上表现更好,但教育成绩与主导学习风格之间没有显著关系(P≥0.05)。
研究结果支持主导学习风格并非预测教育成绩的唯一关键因素。相反,它表明了学生的学习偏好,教师在设计学习机会时可予以考虑。