Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Chile, Chile.
J Dent Educ. 2011 Oct;75(10):1390-5.
The purpose of this educational intervention was to diagnose the learning style of a group of low marks (i.e., grades) dental students in Chile and improve their academic achievement by means of remedial teaching. The intervention group was composed of ten students in endodontics and eleven in pedodontics with low marks. These two groups were mutually exclusive. The Kolb test of learning styles was applied to the low mark students group and to the rest of the class (n=72). Diverse methodologies were applied to the low marks students, such as seminars, case-based learning and problem-based learning, directed study, plenary discussions and debate, integration and questions, and web-based learning in an effort to cover all learning styles. Students' perceptions of the educational intervention were assessed by means of a questionnaire. The learning styles of the low marks group were mainly divergent (52.4 percent) and convergent (19 percent). Accommodators and assimilators were 14.3 percent each. The rest of the class showed a very distinct frequencies distribution: divergent 18 percent, convergent 20 percent, accommodators 28 percent, and assimilators 34 percent. After the educational intervention, the mean of the scores obtained by the intervention group in formal evaluations was higher than the average scores obtained before the intervention for both courses. Students' perceptions of the activities were that they were effective for their learning process (76 percent) and that the teaching methodologies were useful mainly to clarify concepts and contents from both courses (82 percent). We can conclude that the use of diverse and participative teaching methodologies in a remedial teaching intervention, to cover all the different learning styles of the students, contributes to improve their marks in formal evaluations.
本教育干预旨在诊断一组智利低分(即成绩)牙科学员的学习风格,并通过补救教学提高他们的学业成绩。干预组由十名牙髓病学学生和十一名儿童牙科学学生组成,他们的成绩较低。这两个组是互斥的。Kolb 学习风格测试应用于低分组学生和全班其余学生(n=72)。为低分组学生应用了各种教学方法,如研讨会、基于案例的学习和基于问题的学习、指导学习、全体讨论和辩论、整合和提问以及基于网络的学习,以涵盖所有学习风格。学生对教育干预的看法通过问卷调查进行评估。低分组学生的学习风格主要是发散型(52.4%)和聚合型(19%)。适应型和同化型各占 14.3%。其余学生的学习风格分布非常明显:发散型 18%,聚合型 20%,适应型 28%,同化型 34%。教育干预后,干预组在正式评估中获得的分数平均值高于干预前两门课程的平均分数。学生对活动的看法是,这些活动对他们的学习过程很有效(76%),教学方法主要对澄清两门课程的概念和内容很有用(82%)。我们可以得出结论,在补救教学干预中使用多种参与式教学方法,涵盖学生所有不同的学习风格,有助于提高他们在正式评估中的成绩。