Sharp Paul B, Miller Gregory A, Heller Wendy
University of Illinois Champaign-Urbana, United States.
University of Illinois Champaign-Urbana, United States; University of California Los Angeles, United States.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2015 Nov;98(2 Pt 2):365-377. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 5.
Converging neuroscientific and psychological evidence points to several transdiagnostic factors that cut across DSM-defined disorders, which both affect and are affected by executive dysfunction. Two of these factors, anxious apprehension and anxious arousal, have helped bridge the gap between psychological and neurobiological models of anxiety. The present integration of diverse findings advances an understanding of the relationships between these transdiagnostic anxiety dimensions, their interactions with each other and executive function, and their neural mechanisms. Additionally, a discussion is provided concerning how these constructs fit within the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) matrix developed by the National Institutes of Mental Health and how they relate to other anxiety constructs studied with different methods and at other units of analysis. Suggestions for future research are offered, including how to (1) improve measurement and delineation of these constructs, (2) use new neuroimaging methods and theoretical approaches of how the brain functions to build neural mechanistic models of these constructs, and (3) advance understanding of the relationships of these constructs to diverse emotional phenomena and executive functions.
神经科学和心理学的证据不断汇聚,指向了几个跨越DSM定义障碍的跨诊断因素,这些因素既影响执行功能障碍,又受其影响。其中两个因素,即焦虑性担忧和焦虑性唤起,有助于弥合焦虑的心理学模型和神经生物学模型之间的差距。目前对各种研究结果的整合,推进了我们对这些跨诊断焦虑维度之间的关系、它们彼此之间以及与执行功能的相互作用,以及它们的神经机制的理解。此外,还讨论了这些结构如何契合美国国立精神卫生研究所制定的研究领域标准(RDoC)矩阵,以及它们与用不同方法和在其他分析单位研究的其他焦虑结构有何关系。文中还提供了未来研究的建议,包括如何(1)改进这些结构的测量和界定,(2)使用新的神经成像方法和关于大脑功能的理论方法来构建这些结构的神经机制模型,以及(3)深化对这些结构与各种情绪现象和执行功能之间关系的理解。