Serghi Alexandru, Goebert Deborah A, Andrade Naleen N, Hishinuma Earl S, Lunsford Ryan M, Matsuda Noreen M
a Department of Psychiatry , University of Hawai'i , Honolulu , Hawai'i , USA.
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(3):329-40. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1044658.
The field of medical education is represented by a fairly wide variety of models for utilizing journal clubs as an effective teaching tool, each with varying levels of empirical support. Our own prior attempts at developing and implementing an effective journal club required improvements.
Our intervention consisted of an innovative, effective journal club model that has more well-defined elements that are readily adaptable for other residency programs. The collective strategies were based on the previous literature and our own experiences.
Our intervention was implemented in a department of psychiatry within a university-based medical school. Study participants came from a psychiatry department's residency programs (N = 36) during academic year 2011-2012 with senior residents having the option to attend journal club. Using a multifaceted approach, measures included attendance, presession quizzes, postsession evaluations, and a final postcourse evaluation of 11 dimensions (e.g., goals, objectives).
Thirty-one (86%) trainees attended journal club-a substantial increase from previous years. The presession-quiz median was 4.4 total correct out of 6 questions (range = 3.3-5.3), indicating that the articles were generally read before the session. The postsession-evaluation median was 4.6 (1-5 scale, 5 the highest; range = 4.1-4.8), indicating sessions were well received. The final postcourse-evaluation overall mean was 3.9 (1-5 scale, 5 the highest; subscale M range = 3.4-4.5). Qualitative and quantitative analyses of the postcourse evaluation indicated the following positive aspects: educational objectives generally met, overall structured format, quality of discussions, individuals involved (e.g., course directors, trainees, faculty facilitators), and availability of food. Areas of possible improvement included time management within the sessions, more contemporary and clinically relevant articles, consistency in faculty moderators, and evaluation process. Engagement in learning appeared to have been dramatically increased through five strategies: (a) meaningful incentives; (b) assigned, engaged consistently prepared faculty; (c) meaningful evaluation; (d) prejournal club preparations that helped residents assimilate critical appraisal with time-and-task-management skills; and (e) a planning group that developed and improved curricula and instruction to meet the objectives of the course.
Overall, effective, and successful journal clubs require systematic planning, implementation, modification, and refinement.
医学教育领域存在相当多种利用期刊俱乐部作为有效教学工具的模式,每种模式的实证支持程度各不相同。我们之前在开发和实施有效的期刊俱乐部方面的尝试需要改进。
我们的干预措施包括一种创新、有效的期刊俱乐部模式,该模式具有更明确的要素,易于适用于其他住院医师培训项目。这些集体策略基于先前的文献和我们自己的经验。
我们的干预措施在一所大学医学院的精神病学系实施。研究参与者来自该精神病学系2011 - 2012学年的住院医师培训项目(N = 36),高级住院医师可以选择参加期刊俱乐部。采用多方面的方法,测量指标包括出勤率、会前测验、会后评估以及对11个维度(如目标、目的)的课程结束后最终评估。
31名(86%)学员参加了期刊俱乐部,较前几年有大幅增加。会前测验中位数是6道题中总共答对4.4道(范围 = 3.3 - 5.3),表明学员们通常在会议前阅读了文章。会后评估中位数是4.6(1 - 5分制,5分为最高;范围 = 4.1 - 4.8),表明会议受到好评。课程结束后最终评估的总体平均分为3.9(1 - 5分制,5分为最高;子量表M范围 = 3.4 - 4.5)。对课程结束后评估的定性和定量分析表明了以下积极方面:教育目标总体达成、整体结构形式、讨论质量、参与人员(如课程主任、学员、教员主持人)以及食物供应。可能需要改进的方面包括会议期间的时间管理、更具时效性和临床相关性的文章、教员主持人的一致性以及评估过程。通过以下五种策略,学习参与度似乎有了显著提高:(a)有意义的激励措施;(b)指定并始终安排有准备的教员;(c)有意义的评估;(d)会前准备,帮助住院医师将批判性评估与时间和任务管理技能相结合;(e)一个规划小组,开发和改进课程及教学以实现课程目标。
总体而言,有效且成功的期刊俱乐部需要系统的规划、实施、修改和完善。