• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左主干冠状动脉狭窄的经皮介入治疗进展

Update on percutaneous intervention for left main coronary artery stenosis.

作者信息

Lee Pil Hyung, Ahn Jung-Min, Park Seung-Jung

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2015;13(8):933-43. doi: 10.1586/14779072.2015.1065730. Epub 2015 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1586/14779072.2015.1065730
PMID:26159652
Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using drug-eluting stents (DES) is currently considered as a viable alternative to coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) for selected patients with left main coronary artery disease. The updated results of the landmark randomized trials comparing CABG versus PCI demonstrated comparable 5-year outcomes and are in line with the current guidelines that designate PCI as a reasonable treatment in this disease subset. Given that the completed randomized trials did not include contemporary DESs, the upcoming results of the ongoing trials evaluating the performance of new-generation DES compared with CABG (such as the EXCEL trial), may further help to clarify the current role and future recommendations of PCI for left main coronary artery disease. Apart from the recent stent technology, further improvements in outcomes after PCI may be possible when it is used with an integrated approach that combines functional concepts for decision-making, adjunctive imaging support and optimal pharmacotherapies.

摘要

对于某些患有左主干冠状动脉疾病的患者,使用药物洗脱支架(DES)的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)目前被认为是冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的一种可行替代方案。比较CABG与PCI的具有里程碑意义的随机试验的最新结果显示,两者5年预后相当,符合当前将PCI指定为该疾病亚组合理治疗方法的指南。鉴于已完成的随机试验未纳入当代DES,正在进行的评估新一代DES与CABG相比性能的试验(如EXCEL试验)的即将公布的结果,可能会进一步有助于阐明PCI在左主干冠状动脉疾病中的当前作用和未来建议。除了近期的支架技术外,当PCI与结合了决策功能概念、辅助成像支持和最佳药物治疗的综合方法一起使用时,PCI术后的预后可能会进一步改善。

相似文献

1
Update on percutaneous intervention for left main coronary artery stenosis.左主干冠状动脉狭窄的经皮介入治疗进展
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2015;13(8):933-43. doi: 10.1586/14779072.2015.1065730. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
2
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with 3-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: final results from the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial.药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与旁路手术治疗 3 支血管病变或左主干病变患者的成本效益:紫杉醇药物洗脱支架与心脏手术(SYNTAX)试验的最终结果。
Circulation. 2014 Sep 30;130(14):1146-57. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009985. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
3
Impact of coronary anatomy and stenting technique on long-term outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.药物洗脱支架置入治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病后,冠状动脉解剖结构和支架技术对长期预后的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
4
Percutaneous coronary intervention as an alternative to bypass surgery for unprotected LMCA stenosis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗作为无保护左主干狭窄旁路手术的替代方案。
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2008 Sep;6(8):1107-14. doi: 10.1586/14779072.6.8.1107.
5
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗开口/中段病变与无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期临床结局:DELTA 注册研究(左主干冠状动脉疾病药物洗脱支架):一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.005.
6
The EXCEL and NOBLE trials: similarities, contrasts and future perspectives for left main revascularisation.EXCEL和NOBLE试验:左主干血运重建的相似之处、对比及未来展望。
EuroIntervention. 2015;11 Suppl V:V115-9. doi: 10.4244/EIJV11SVA26.
7
Long-term forecasting and comparison of mortality in the Evaluation of the Xience Everolimus Eluting Stent vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization (EXCEL) trial: prospective validation of the SYNTAX Score II.EXCEL 试验中依维莫司洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干血运重建效果的长期预测和死亡率比较:SYNTAX 评分 II 的前瞻性验证。
Eur Heart J. 2015 May 21;36(20):1231-41. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu518. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
8
Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病的比较
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Feb 15;119(4):520-527. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.11.003. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
9
5-year outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation versus coronary artery bypass graft for unprotected left main coronary artery lesions the Milan experience.药物洗脱支架置入与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干病变的 5 年结果:米兰经验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jun;3(6):595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.03.014.
10
Long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions or coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease in octogenarians (from a Drug-Eluting stent for LefT main Artery registry substudy).高龄患者左主干病变行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期结果(来自药物洗脱支架左主干注册研究的亚组研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jun 15;113(12):2007-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.03.044. Epub 2014 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in left main coronary artery disease an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病的比较:随机临床试验的最新荟萃分析
Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 10;8(39):66449-66457. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20142. eCollection 2017 Sep 12.