Kurokawa Marie, Watanabe Nemoto Miho, Harada Rintaro, Kobayashi Hiroki, Horikoshi Takuro, Kanazawa Aki, Togasaki Gentaro, Abe Yukinao, Chazono Hideaki, Hanazawa Toyoyuki, Okamoto Yoshitaka, Uno Takashi
Department of Radiology, Chiba University Hospital, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, Japan
Department of Radiology, Chiba University Hospital, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, Japan Diagnostic Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, Japan.
J Radiat Res. 2015 Sep;56(5):849-55. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrv038. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
In Japan, cetuximab with concurrent bioradiotherapy (BRT) for squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN) was approved in December 2012. We herein report our initial experience of BRT, with special emphasis on acute toxicities of this combination therapy. Thirty-one non-metastatic SCCHN patients who underwent BRT using cetuximab between July 2013 and June 2014 were retrospectively evaluated. All patients received cetuximab with a loading dose of 400 mg/m(2) one week before the start of radiotherapy, followed by 250 mg/m(2) per week during radiotherapy. The median cycle of cetuximab was seven cycles and the median dose of radiotherapy was 70 Gy. Twenty-five patients (80.6%) accomplished planned radiotherapy and six cycles or more cetuximab administration. Six patients (19.4%) discontinued cetuximab. Grade 3 dermatitis, mucositis and infusion reaction occurred in 19.4%, 48.3% and 3.2%, respectively. One patient experienced Grade 3 gastrointestinal bleeding caused by diverticular hemorrhage during BRT. Grade 3 drug-induced pneumonitis occurred in two patients. The response rate was 74%, including 55% with a complete response. BRT using cetuximab for Japanese patients with SCCHN was feasible as an alternative for cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation, although longer follow-up is necessary to evaluate late toxicities.
在日本,西妥昔单抗联合生物放疗(BRT)用于治疗头颈部鳞状细胞癌(SCCHN)于2012年12月获得批准。我们在此报告我们BRT的初步经验,特别强调这种联合治疗的急性毒性。对2013年7月至2014年6月间接受使用西妥昔单抗的BRT治疗的31例非转移性SCCHN患者进行回顾性评估。所有患者在放疗开始前一周接受400mg/m²的西妥昔单抗负荷剂量,随后在放疗期间每周接受250mg/m²。西妥昔单抗的中位疗程为7个周期,放疗的中位剂量为70Gy。25例患者(80.6%)完成了计划的放疗及6个周期或更多周期的西妥昔单抗给药。6例患者(19.4%)停用西妥昔单抗。3级皮炎、黏膜炎和输液反应的发生率分别为19.4%、48.3%和3.2%。1例患者在BRT期间因憩室出血发生3级胃肠道出血。2例患者发生3级药物性肺炎。缓解率为74%,其中完全缓解率为55%。对于日本SCCHN患者,使用西妥昔单抗的BRT作为基于顺铂的同步放化疗的替代方案是可行的,尽管需要更长时间的随访来评估晚期毒性。