Suppr超能文献

同期卡铂或西妥昔单抗联合放疗治疗不适合顺铂治疗的局部晚期头颈部癌症患者的安全性和疗效。

Safety and efficacy of concurrent carboplatin or cetuximab plus radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer patients ineligible for treatment with cisplatin.

机构信息

Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 May;24(5):468-475. doi: 10.1007/s10147-018-01392-9. Epub 2019 Jan 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LASCCHN) is usually treated with cisplatin (CDDP)-based chemoradiotherapy, except when patients are elderly or have renal, cardiac, or neurogenic dysfunction. This study compared the safety and efficacy of concurrent carboplatin (CBDCA) to cetuximab (Cmab) plus radiotherapy (RT) in patients ineligible for CDDP treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed LASCCHN patients who received CBDCA plus RT (n = 29) or Cmab plus RT (n = 18) due to ineligibility for CDDP treatment at two Japanese institutions between August 2006 and December 2015.

RESULTS

Patients characteristics for CBDCA plus RT and Cmab plus RT were: median age, 74 and 75 years; 0-1 performance status, 90% and 100%; main primary tumor site, hypopharynx 52% (n = 15) and oropharynx 39% (n = 7); and stage IV, 90% (n = 26) and 50% (n = 9), respectively. With a median follow-up time of 60.0 months for CBDCA plus RT and 53.6 months for Cmab plus RT, 3-year locoregional control rates were 56% versus 58%, and median progression-free survival was 42.7 versus 11.6 months. CBDCA plus RT was associated with more grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities, including neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, whereas Cmab plus RT was associated with more grade 3/4 oral mucositis and radiation dermatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

CBDCA or Cmab as a concurrent systemic therapy with RT is a possible treatment option for LASCCHN patients ineligible for CDDP treatment, although attention to hematological toxicity should be paid.

摘要

背景

局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(LASCCHN)通常采用顺铂(CDDP)为基础的放化疗治疗,除非患者年龄较大或存在肾功能、心脏或神经功能障碍。本研究比较了卡铂(CBDCA)联合西妥昔单抗(Cmab)与放疗(RT),以及顺铂(CDDP)治疗方案在不适合 CDDP 治疗的患者中的安全性和疗效。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2006 年 8 月至 2015 年 12 月期间,在两家日本机构因不适合 CDDP 治疗而接受 CBDCA 联合 RT(n=29)或 Cmab 联合 RT(n=18)的 LASCCHN 患者。

结果

CBDCA 联合 RT 和 Cmab 联合 RT 患者的特征为:中位年龄分别为 74 岁和 75 岁;0-1 期表现状态为 90%和 100%;主要原发肿瘤部位分别为下咽 52%(n=15)和口咽 39%(n=7);以及 IV 期分别为 90%(n=26)和 50%(n=9)。CBDCA 联合 RT 的中位随访时间为 60.0 个月,Cmab 联合 RT 的中位随访时间为 53.6 个月,3 年局部区域控制率分别为 56%和 58%,中位无进展生存期分别为 42.7 个月和 11.6 个月。CBDCA 联合 RT 相关的 3/4 级血液学毒性更多,包括中性粒细胞减少症和血小板减少症,而 Cmab 联合 RT 相关的 3/4 级口腔粘膜炎和放射性皮炎更多。

结论

对于不适合 CDDP 治疗的 LASCCHN 患者,CBDCA 或 Cmab 联合 RT 作为同期全身治疗是一种可能的治疗选择,尽管应注意血液学毒性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验