Chaturvedi Sarika, De Costa Ayesha, Raven Joanna
Department of Public Health and Environment, R D Gardi Medical College, Ujjain, India.
Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden;
Glob Health Action. 2015 Jul 7;8:27427. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.27427. eCollection 2015.
Access to facility delivery in India has significantly increased with the Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) cash transfer programme to promote facility births. However, a decline in maternal mortality has only followed secular trends as seen from the beginning of the decade well before the programme began. We, therefore, examined the quality of intrapartum care provided in facilities under the JSY programme to study whether it ensures skilled attendance at birth.
Three themes emerged from the data: 1) delivery environment is chaotic: delivery rooms were not conducive to safe, women-friendly care provision, and coordination between providers was poor. 2) Staff do not provide skilled care routinely: this emerged from observations that monitoring was limited to assessment of cervical dilatation, lack of readiness to provide key elements of care, and the execution of harmful/unnecessary practices coupled with poor techniques. 3) Dominant staff, passive recipients: staff sometimes threatened, abused, or ignored women during delivery; women were passive and accepted dominance and disrespect. Attendants served as 'go-betweens' patients and providers. The interviews with providers revealed their awareness of the compromised quality of care, but they were constrained by structural problems. Positive practices were also observed, including companionship during childbirth and women mobilising in the early stages of labour.
Our observational study did not suggest an adequate level of skilled birth attendance (SBA). The findings reveal insufficiencies in the health system and organisational structures to provide an 'enabling environment' for SBA. We highlight the need to ensure quality obstetric care prior to increasing coverage of facility births if cash transfer programmes like the JSY are to improve health outcomes.
随着旨在促进机构分娩的“贾纳尼·苏拉卡莎·尤贾纳”(JSY)现金转移计划的实施,印度机构分娩的可及性显著提高。然而,孕产妇死亡率的下降只是遵循了该计划开始前十年初就已出现的长期趋势。因此,我们研究了JSY计划下各机构提供的分娩期护理质量,以探讨其是否能确保熟练的接生服务。
1)在中央邦11家机构的代表性样本中,对阴道分娩的分娩期护理进行18次非参与式观察,记录分娩期护理期间发生的情况。2)对医护人员进行10次访谈,探究提供此类护理的原因。采用主题框架分析法。
数据得出三个主题:1)分娩环境混乱:产房不利于提供安全、对女性友好的护理,医护人员之间的协调不佳。2)工作人员并非常规提供熟练护理:观察发现,监测仅限于宫颈扩张评估,缺乏提供关键护理要素的准备,存在有害/不必要的操作及技术欠佳的情况。3)主导的工作人员,被动的接受者:工作人员有时在分娩期间威胁、虐待或忽视产妇;产妇处于被动状态,接受主导和不尊重。陪产人员充当患者与医护人员之间的“中间人”。对医护人员的访谈显示他们意识到护理质量受损,但受到结构性问题的制约。也观察到了积极做法,包括分娩期间的陪伴以及产妇在分娩早期的活动。
我们的观察性研究并未表明熟练接生服务(SBA)达到了足够水平。研究结果揭示了卫生系统和组织结构在为SBA提供“有利环境”方面存在不足。我们强调,如果像JSY这样的现金转移计划要改善健康结果,在扩大机构分娩覆盖范围之前,必须确保高质量的产科护理。