• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度九个表现不佳的邦的机构分娩情况:水平、决定因素和可及性。

Institutional deliveries in India's nine low performing states: levels, determinants and accessibility.

机构信息

Public Health Consultant, London, UK.

Centre for the Study of Regional Development, School of Social Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):2001145. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.2001145.

DOI:10.1080/16549716.2021.2001145
PMID:34914883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8682830/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the implementation of several national-level interventions, institutional delivery coverage remains unsatisfactory in India's low performing states (LPS), leading to a high burden of maternal mortality.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates the levels, differentials, and determinants of institutional deliveries in LPS of India. The study also delineates a holistic understanding of barriers to delivery at health facilities and the utilization of the (JSY) specifically designed to improve maternal and child health of disadvantaged communities.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS)-4, 2015-16. The study was carried out over India's nine LPS utilizing 112,518 women who had a living child in the past five years preceding the survey. Bivariate and multivariate regression analysis techniques were used to yield findings.

RESULTS

Of the study sample, nearly three-quarters (74%) of women delivered in a health institution in the study area, with the majority delivered in public health facilities. The multivariate analysis indicates that women who lived in rural areas, belonged to disadvantaged social groups (e.g. Scheduled caste/tribes and Muslims), and those who married early (before 18 years) were less likely to utilize institutional delivery services. On the other hand, women's education, household wealth, and exposure to mass media were found to be strong facilitators of delivering in a health facility. Meeting with a community health worker (CHW) during pregnancy emerged as an important predictor of institutional delivery in our study. Further, interaction analysis shows that women who reported the distance was a 'big problem' in accessing medical care had significantly lower odds of delivering at a health facility.

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggests emphasizing the quality of in-facility maternal care and awareness about the importance of reproductive health. Furthermore, strengthening sub-national policies specifically in underperforming states is imperative to improve institutional delivery coverage.

摘要

背景

尽管印度实施了多项国家级干预措施,但在表现不佳的邦(LPS),产妇住院分娩率仍不理想,导致孕产妇死亡率居高不下。

目的

本研究旨在调查印度 LPS 地区产妇住院分娩率的水平、差异和决定因素。此外,本研究还全面了解了在卫生机构分娩的障碍以及专门为改善弱势社区母婴健康而设计的(JSY)的利用情况。

方法

本研究使用了 2015-16 年全国家庭健康调查(NFHS-4)的数据,采用了横断面研究方法。该研究在印度的 9 个 LPS 地区进行,共有 112518 名在调查前五年内生育过活产儿的妇女参与。采用了单变量和多变量回归分析技术来得出研究结果。

结果

在研究样本中,近四分之三(74%)的妇女在研究地区的医疗机构分娩,其中大部分在公立医疗机构分娩。多变量分析表明,居住在农村地区、属于弱势社会群体(如在册种姓/部落和穆斯林)以及早婚(18 岁之前)的妇女较少利用住院分娩服务。另一方面,妇女的教育程度、家庭财富和接触大众媒体被发现是在医疗机构分娩的有力促进因素。在怀孕期间与社区卫生工作者(CHW)会面被认为是本研究中产妇住院分娩的一个重要预测因素。此外,交互分析表明,报告医疗服务获取存在“大问题”的妇女在医疗机构分娩的可能性显著降低。

结论

本研究表明,应强调医疗机构内产妇护理的质量和对生殖健康重要性的认识。此外,加强次国家级政策,特别是在表现不佳的邦,对于提高产妇住院分娩率至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6394/8682830/a9fc78423b04/ZGHA_A_2001145_F0007_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6394/8682830/ae3b70af2367/ZGHA_A_2001145_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6394/8682830/3ed2ebbb3429/ZGHA_A_2001145_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6394/8682830/67521a68e9a3/ZGHA_A_2001145_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6394/8682830/99d35f3909d9/ZGHA_A_2001145_F0004_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6394/8682830/1816f1649b5a/ZGHA_A_2001145_F0005_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6394/8682830/5f40d654dda9/ZGHA_A_2001145_F0006_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6394/8682830/a9fc78423b04/ZGHA_A_2001145_F0007_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6394/8682830/ae3b70af2367/ZGHA_A_2001145_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6394/8682830/3ed2ebbb3429/ZGHA_A_2001145_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6394/8682830/67521a68e9a3/ZGHA_A_2001145_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6394/8682830/99d35f3909d9/ZGHA_A_2001145_F0004_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6394/8682830/1816f1649b5a/ZGHA_A_2001145_F0005_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6394/8682830/5f40d654dda9/ZGHA_A_2001145_F0006_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6394/8682830/a9fc78423b04/ZGHA_A_2001145_F0007_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
Institutional deliveries in India's nine low performing states: levels, determinants and accessibility.印度九个表现不佳的邦的机构分娩情况:水平、决定因素和可及性。
Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):2001145. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.2001145.
2
Predictors of maternal health services utilization by poor, rural women: a comparative study in Indian States of Gujarat and Tamil Nadu.贫困农村妇女利用孕产妇保健服务的预测因素:古吉拉特邦和泰米尔纳德邦的一项对比研究
J Health Popul Nutr. 2015 Jul 31;33:9. doi: 10.1186/s41043-015-0025-x.
3
Regional inequality in the Janani Suraksha Yojana coverage in India: a geo-spatial analysis.印度“贾纳尼·苏拉克莎·尤佳娜”覆盖范围的地区不平等:一项地理空间分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jan 7;20(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01366-2.
4
How equitable is the uptake of conditional cash transfers for maternity care in India? Evidence from the Janani Suraksha Yojana scheme in Odisha and Jharkhand.印度孕产妇保健有条件现金转移的普及情况有多公平?来自奥里萨邦和贾坎德邦“贾纳尼·苏拉卡莎·尤佳娜”计划的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Mar 10;16(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0539-5.
5
India's Conditional Cash Transfer Programme (the JSY) to Promote Institutional Birth: Is There an Association between Institutional Birth Proportion and Maternal Mortality?印度促进机构分娩的有条件现金转移计划(JSY):机构分娩比例与孕产妇死亡率之间存在关联吗?
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 27;8(6):e67452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067452. Print 2013.
6
Barriers and prospects of India's conditional cash transfer program to promote institutional delivery care: a qualitative analysis of the supply-side perspectives.印度有条件现金转移计划促进机构分娩护理的障碍与前景:基于供方视角的质性分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 25;18(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2849-8.
7
Inequalities in institutional delivery uptake and maternal mortality reduction in the context of cash incentive program, Janani Suraksha Yojana: results from nine states in India.在现金激励计划“贾纳尼·苏拉卡莎·尤佳娜”背景下机构分娩利用率和孕产妇死亡率降低方面的不平等:印度九个邦的结果
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Dec;123:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.042. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
8
Out-of-pocket expenditures for childbirth in the context of the Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) cash transfer program to promote facility births: who pays and how much? Studies from Madhya Pradesh, India.在印度中央邦实施的旨在促进机构分娩的“贾纳尼·苏拉卡莎·尤佳娜”(JSY)现金转移计划背景下的分娩自付费用:谁来支付以及支付多少?相关研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2016 May 3;15:71. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0362-4.
9
A qualitative study of factors impacting accessing of institutional delivery care in the context of India's cash incentive program.印度现金激励计划背景下影响机构分娩服务获取的因素定性研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Apr;178:55-65. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.059. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
10
Comparison of Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) and augmented Arogya Laxmi scheme (ALS) in improving maternal and child health outcomes in urban settlements of Hyderabad, South India.比较简尼萨拉克沙亚约纳(JSY)和增强型阿罗格亚拉克希米计划(ALS)在改善印度南部海得拉巴城市住区母婴健康结果的作用。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Mar 8;24(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06381-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Utilization of maternal healthcare services in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.低收入和中等收入国家孕产妇保健服务的利用情况:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 16;14(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02832-0.
2
Demand side financing for promoting institutional delivery: experiences of Janani Suraksha Yojana in Indian states.促进机构分娩的需求侧融资:印度各邦“贾纳尼·苏拉卡莎·尤贾纳”计划的经验
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2025 Jan 22. doi: 10.1007/s10754-025-09391-w.
3
Burden of neural tube defects in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Why women choose to deliver at home in India: a study of prevalence, factors, and socio-economic inequality.为什么印度的女性选择在家分娩:一项关于流行率、因素和社会经济不平等的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 2;21(1):1785. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11779-5.
2
Impact of socio-economic inequity in access to maternal health benefits in India: Evidence from Janani Suraksha Yojana using NFHS data.印度在获取孕产妇健康福利方面的社会经济不平等的影响:基于 NFHS 数据的《孕产妇安全保障计划》证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 11;16(3):e0247935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247935. eCollection 2021.
3
Comparative study on maternal healthcare services utilisation in selected Empowered Action Group states of India.
印度神经管缺陷的负担:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2024 Dec;40(12):4123-4135. doi: 10.1007/s00381-024-06627-x. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
4
Impact of Institutionalisation of Births on Health Policies and Birth Registration in India.印度生育机构化对卫生政策和出生登记的影响。
Ann Glob Health. 2024 Aug 16;90(1):53. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4474. eCollection 2024.
5
Charting the Course: Towards a Comprehensive Newborn Screening Program in India.规划路线:迈向印度全面的新生儿筛查项目
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2024 Jun 24;10(3):43. doi: 10.3390/ijns10030043.
6
Wealth and education-related inequalities in the utilisation of reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health interventions within scheduled tribes in India: an analysis of Odisha and Jharkhand.印度 scheduled tribes 中生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康干预措施利用方面的财富和教育相关不平等:奥里萨邦和贾坎德邦的分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 17;24(1):1605. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18857-4.
7
Impact of social determinants of health on progression from potentially life-threatening complications to near miss events and death during pregnancy and post partum in a middle-income setting: an observational study.社会决定因素对中低收入环境中妊娠和产后期间从潜在危及生命的并发症发展到接近错失事件和死亡的影响:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 27;14(5):e081996. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081996.
8
Multilevel analysis of determinants in postnatal care utilisation among mother-newborn pairs in India, 2019-21.2019-21 年印度母婴配对产后护理利用情况的决定因素多层次分析。
J Glob Health. 2024 May 10;14:04085. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04085.
9
Influence of Sociodemographic Factors on Stunting, Wasting, and Underweight Among Children Under Two Years of Age Born During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Central India: A Cross-Sectional Study.社会人口学因素对印度中部新冠疫情期间出生的两岁以下儿童发育迟缓、消瘦和体重不足的影响:一项横断面研究
Cureus. 2024 Mar 18;16(3):e56381. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56381. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
Are institutional deliveries equitable in the southern states of India? A benefit incidence analysis.印度南部邦的机构分娩公平吗?一项受益情况分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Jan 30;23(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02097-4.
印度部分赋权行动组邦产妇保健服务利用情况的对比研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Nov;29(6):1948-1959. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13309. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
4
Regional inequality in the Janani Suraksha Yojana coverage in India: a geo-spatial analysis.印度“贾纳尼·苏拉克莎·尤佳娜”覆盖范围的地区不平等:一项地理空间分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jan 7;20(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01366-2.
5
Understanding equity of institutional delivery in public health centre by level of care in India: an assessment using benefit incidence analysis.理解印度公共卫生中心按护理水平提供机构分娩服务的公平性:使用受益归属分析进行评估。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Dec 9;19(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01331-z.
6
Fear of childbirth amid COVID-19 in India: Neglected aspect of maternal mental health.印度新冠疫情期间对分娩的恐惧:孕产妇心理健康被忽视的方面。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;67(8):1074-1076. doi: 10.1177/0020764020979019. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
7
Not just money: what mothers value in conditional cash transfer programs in India.不仅仅是金钱:印度母亲对有条件现金转移计划的重视。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003033.
8
A ten year analysis of maternal deaths in a tertiary hospital using the three delays model.利用三延误模型对一家三级医院产妇死亡进行的十年分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Oct 6;20(1):585. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03262-7.
9
Factors influencing institutional delivery and the role of accredited social health activist (ASHA): a secondary analysis of India human development survey 2012.影响机构分娩的因素及认证社会卫生活动家(ASHA)的作用:对 2012 年印度人类发展调查的二次分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Aug 5;20(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03127-z.
10
Systematic review of barriers to, and facilitators of, the provision of high-quality midwifery services in India.系统评价印度提供高质量助产服务的障碍和促进因素。
Birth. 2020 Dec;47(4):304-321. doi: 10.1111/birt.12498. Epub 2020 Jul 25.