Holekamp Kay E, Dantzer Ben, Stricker Gregory, Shaw Yoshida Kathryn C, Benson-Amram Sarah
Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, U.S.A ; BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, U.S.A.
Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, U.S.A ; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, U.S.A.
Anim Behav. 2015 May 1;103:237-248. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.01.023.
Theoretically intelligence should evolve to help animals solve specific types of problems posed by the environment, but it remains unclear how environmental complexity or novelty facilitates the evolutionary enhancement of cognitive abilities, or whether domain-general intelligence can evolve in response to domain-specific selection pressures. The social complexity hypothesis, which posits that intelligence evolved to cope with the labile behaviour of conspecific group-mates, has been strongly supported by work on the sociocognitive abilities of primates and other animals. Here we review the remarkable convergence in social complexity between cercopithecine primates and spotted hyaenas, and describe our tests of predictions of the social complexity hypothesis in regard to both cognition and brain size in hyaenas. Behavioural data indicate that there has been remarkable convergence between primates and hyaenas with respect to their abilities in the domain of social cognition. Furthermore, within the family Hyaenidae, our data suggest that social complexity might have contributed to enlargement of the frontal cortex. However, social complexity failed to predict either brain volume or frontal cortex volume in a larger array of mammalian carnivores. To address the question of whether or not social complexity might be able to explain the evolution of domain-general intelligence as well as social cognition in particular, we presented simple puzzle boxes, baited with food and scaled to accommodate body size, to members of 39 carnivore species housed in zoos and found that species with larger brains relative to their body mass were more innovative and more successful at opening the boxes. However, social complexity failed to predict success in solving this problem. Overall our work suggests that, although social complexity enhances social cognition, there are no unambiguous causal links between social complexity and either brain size or performance in problem-solving tasks outside the social domain in mammalian carnivores.
从理论上讲,智力的进化应有助于动物解决由环境提出的特定类型问题,但目前仍不清楚环境复杂性或新颖性如何促进认知能力的进化提升,也不清楚通用领域智力是否能因特定领域的选择压力而进化。社会复杂性假说认为,智力的进化是为了应对同种群体成员不稳定的行为,这一假说得到了有关灵长类动物和其他动物社会认知能力研究的有力支持。在此,我们回顾了猕猴科灵长类动物和斑鬣狗在社会复杂性方面的显著趋同现象,并描述了我们针对斑鬣狗认知和脑容量方面对社会复杂性假说预测的测试。行为数据表明,灵长类动物和斑鬣狗在社会认知领域的能力方面存在显著趋同。此外,在鬣狗科内部,我们的数据表明社会复杂性可能促使了额叶皮质增大。然而,在更广泛的哺乳动物食肉动物群体中,社会复杂性未能预测脑容量或额叶皮质容量。为了解决社会复杂性是否能够解释通用领域智力的进化以及特别是社会认知这一问题,我们向动物园中饲养的39种食肉动物展示了装有食物且按体型大小调整的简单拼图盒,发现相对于体重而言脑容量较大的物种在打开盒子方面更具创新性且更成功。然而,社会复杂性未能预测解决这一问题的成功率。总体而言,我们的研究表明,尽管社会复杂性增强了社会认知,但在哺乳动物食肉动物中,社会复杂性与脑容量或社会领域之外解决问题任务的表现之间不存在明确的因果联系。