Luo Chao-Bao, Chang Feng-Chi, Teng Michael Mu-Huo, Guo Wan-Yuo, Ting Ta-Wei
Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC; Department of Radiology, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yuanpei University of Medical Technology, Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROC.
Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC; Department of Radiology, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
J Chin Med Assoc. 2015 Sep;78(9):526-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
Trans-inferior petrous sinus (IPS) coil embolization is an efficient and safe method to manage cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistulas (CSDAVFs). However, some CSDAVFs may be associated with angiographic occlusive IPS making access difficult. The purpose of this study was to report our experience of transvenous embolization of the CSDAVF via angiographic occlusive IPS.
We reviewed the cases of 20 patients who underwent transvenous embolization via angiographic occlusive IPS over a 6 year period. The study consisted of seven men and 13 women, ranging from 46 years to 78 years of age (mean, 60 years). We retrospectively analyzed the angioarchitecture of the CSDAVFs, the procedural time and the angiographic as well as the clinical outcomes after embolization.
True occlusive IPS was found in 13 of the patients, while patent IPS with compartment of the IPS-CS was demonstrated in the remaining seven patients. The microcatheter was successfully navigated to the fistula site of the CS in 16 patients (80%), while such navigation failed in four patients following numerous attempts. The mean procedural times for truly occlusive IPS and for compartment of the IPS-CS were 111 minutes and 129 minutes, respectively. No recurrent fistula was observed on follow-up neuroimages. Three patients had transient third or sixth cranial nerve palsy, and one patient had perforation of the IPS leading to temporary headache. The mean clinical follow-up period was 18 months.
Angiographic occlusive IPS of CSDAVF may be related to true occlusion of IPS or patent IPS with compartment of the IPS-CS. There is no statistically significant difference in procedural times for these two different fistula anatomies. Transvenous embolization via angiographic occlusive IPS is a safe and effective method to manage CSDAVFs.
经岩下窦(IPS)弹簧圈栓塞术是治疗海绵窦硬脑膜动静脉瘘(CSDAVF)的一种安全有效的方法。然而,一些CSDAVF可能与血管造影显示的闭塞性IPS相关,这使得穿刺进入困难。本研究的目的是报告我们经血管造影显示的闭塞性IPS对CSDAVF进行经静脉栓塞的经验。
我们回顾了20例在6年期间经血管造影显示的闭塞性IPS进行经静脉栓塞的患者病例。该研究包括7名男性和13名女性,年龄在46岁至78岁之间(平均60岁)。我们回顾性分析了CSDAVF的血管结构、手术时间以及栓塞后的血管造影和临床结果。
13例患者发现真正的闭塞性IPS,其余7例患者显示IPS-CS腔隙的IPS通畅。16例患者(80%)的微导管成功到达CS的瘘口部位,而4例患者经过多次尝试后未能成功。真正闭塞性IPS和IPS-CS腔隙的平均手术时间分别为111分钟和129分钟。随访神经影像未观察到复发性瘘。3例患者出现短暂性动眼神经或展神经麻痹,1例患者IPS穿孔导致暂时性头痛。平均临床随访期为18个月。
CSDAVF的血管造影显示的闭塞性IPS可能与IPS的真正闭塞或IPS-CS腔隙的IPS通畅有关。这两种不同瘘管解剖结构的手术时间在统计学上无显著差异。经血管造影显示的闭塞性IPS进行经静脉栓塞是治疗CSDAVF的一种安全有效的方法。