Suppr超能文献

“你不会向所有人展示你的弱点”:老年人对利用家庭小组会议重新获得控制权和自主权的看法。

'You don't show everyone your weakness': Older adults' views on using Family Group Conferencing to regain control and autonomy.

作者信息

Metze Rosalie N, Kwekkeboom Rick H, Abma Tineke A

机构信息

Amsterdam University of Applied Social Sciences, Research Centre for Society and Law, Wibautstraat 5a, 1091 GH Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Dept. Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Centre and EMGO+ Research Institute, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Aging Stud. 2015 Aug;34:57-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 May 15.

Abstract

AIM

Family Group Conferencing (FGC), a model in which a person and his or her social network make their own 'care' plan, is used in youth care and might also be useful in elderly care to support older persons living at home. In Amsterdam, the Netherlands, FGC was implemented for older adults but they showed resistance. Reasons for this resistance have been researched and are described in this article. We examine existing views and attitudes of older adults concerning the use of FGC, and report on how older adults see the possibility to regain control over their lives using FGC.

METHOD

To do this, focus group sessions, duo interviews and individual interviews were held with older adults with varying characteristics: living at home, in sheltered housing, or in a home for the elderly; and living in urban, suburban or rural areas. Themes were: views on and contentment with the control and autonomy that they experience in their lives, and the willingness to use FGC to improve this.

RESULTS

The main reasons for our respondents to resist FGC were: expecting people to be there for them without a FGC, not feeling ready yet for a FGC, feeling embarrassed when asking for help, being reluctant to open up about their problems, and having the fear of losing control when organizing a FGC. We conclude that, for this generation of older adults, FGC means losing control and autonomy rather than gaining it. To be appealing to older adults, a relational empowerment strengthening model should most likely be focused on reciprocity, peer-to-peer support, and solutions instead of problems.

摘要

目的

家庭小组会议(FGC)是一种由个人及其社交网络制定自身“护理”计划的模式,应用于青少年护理领域,或许对居家养老的老年人护理也有用处。在荷兰阿姆斯特丹,FGC已应用于老年人,但他们表现出抵触情绪。本文对这种抵触情绪的原因进行了研究并加以描述。我们考察了老年人对使用FGC的现有看法和态度,并报告了老年人如何看待通过FGC重新掌控自己生活的可能性。

方法

为此,我们与具有不同特征的老年人进行了焦点小组会议、双人访谈和个人访谈,这些老年人分别居住在家中、庇护性住房或养老院,且居住在城市、郊区或农村地区。主题包括:对他们在生活中所体验到的控制权和自主权的看法及满意度,以及使用FGC来改善这种状况的意愿。

结果

我们的受访者抵触FGC的主要原因有:期望无需FGC也能有人为他们提供帮助,觉得自己还未准备好接受FGC,求助时感到尴尬,不愿公开自己的问题,以及组织FGC时担心失去控制权。我们得出结论,对于这一代老年人而言,FGC意味着失去控制权和自主权,而非获得。若要吸引老年人,关系赋权强化模式很可能应侧重于互惠、 peer-to-peer支持和解决方案而非问题。 (注:此处“peer-to-peer”直译为“对等的、点对点的”,在该语境中可能是指某种特定的互助形式,因未明确其准确含义,暂保留英文表述)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验