1 Forensic Child and Youth Care Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
2 Child and Adolescent Studies, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Child Maltreat. 2019 May;24(2):137-151. doi: 10.1177/1077559518808221. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
The present study examined the effectiveness of Family Group Conferencing (FGC) in child welfare. Effects were operationalized in terms of child safety (child maltreatment, supervision order, and out-of-home placement), number of professional services used, parental empowerment, and social support in a 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. Furthermore, the influence of family characteristics and the level of FGC completion were examined. A total of 328 families were included, randomly assigned to an experimental group ( n = 229) and a care as usual (CAU) group ( n = 99). FGC was equally effective as CAU in improving child safety but resulted in more out-of-home placements. Furthermore, FGC resulted in a longer duration of child welfare involvement, a marginally higher number of professional services used, and increased parental empowerment and social support. Family characteristics did not moderate the results. Level of FGC completion was in general low. Higher levels of completion were related to a larger social network, a higher number of professional services used, and, marginally, less parental empowerment. In conclusion, although some beneficial results marginally support the use of FGC, it is the question whether these effects outweigh FGC costs, a longer duration of child welfare involvement and a higher number of professional services used.
本研究考察了家庭小组会议(FGC)在儿童福利方面的效果。在 1、3、6 和 12 个月的随访中,效果是通过儿童安全(儿童虐待、监督令和离家安置)、使用的专业服务数量、父母赋权和社会支持来操作化的。此外,还考察了家庭特征和 FGC 完成水平的影响。共有 328 个家庭被纳入研究,随机分为实验组(n=229)和常规护理组(n=99)。FGC 在改善儿童安全方面与常规护理同样有效,但导致更多的离家安置。此外,FGC 导致儿童福利介入的时间延长,使用的专业服务数量略有增加,父母赋权和社会支持增加。家庭特征没有调节结果。FGC 的完成水平总体较低。较高的完成水平与更大的社交网络、更多的专业服务使用以及父母赋权的适度增加有关。总之,尽管一些有益的结果略有支持 FGC 的使用,但这些效果是否超过 FGC 的成本、儿童福利介入时间的延长和使用的专业服务数量的增加,这是一个问题。