Suppr超能文献

床旁超声检查未发现胆结石可排除急性胆囊炎。

The Absence of Gallstones on Point-of-Care Ultrasound Rules Out Acute Cholecystitis.

作者信息

Villar Julian, Summers Shane M, Menchine Michael D, Fox J Christian, Wang Ralph

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 2015 Oct;49(4):475-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.04.037. Epub 2015 Jul 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cholelithiasis affects an estimated 20 million people in the United States yearly; 20% of symptomatic patients will develop acute cholecystitis (AC). A recent single-center study estimating test characteristics of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) for the detection of AC, as defined by gallstones plus sonographic Murphy's or pericholecystic fluid or gallbladder wall-thickening, resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 87% (95% confidence interval [CI] 66-97) and 82% (95% CI 74-88), respectively. No prior studies have been conducted to estimate the test characteristics of POCUS for the purpose of excluding acute calculous cholecystitis.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the finding of gallstones alone on POCUS has high sensitivity, high negative predictive value, and low negative likelihood ratio for the exclusion of AC.

METHODS

We conducted an analysis using data from a prospective cross-sectional single-center study of POCUS test to estimate the test characteristics using a simplified definition of a positive test - the presence of gallstones alone. Clinical follow-up and pathology reports were used as the reference standard. Test characteristics were calculated and compared to the standard definition, gallstones plus one secondary finding.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of AC was 14% (23 pathology-confirmed cases of 164 included patients). The sensitivity of the simplified definition was 100% (95% CI 85.7-100), negative predictive value 100% (95% CI 92.2-100), and negative likelihood ratio was < 0.1, compared to a sensitivity of 87% (95% CI 66-97%), negative predictive value 97% (95% CI 93-99%), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.16 (95% CI 0.06-0.5).

CONCLUSION

Simplifying the definition of the test findings on POCUS to gallstones alone has excellent sensitivity and negative predictive value for the exclusion of AC. This finding, if broadly validated prospectively, confirms the practice of excluding acute calculous cholecystitis using POCUS in emergency department patients.

摘要

背景

在美国,每年估计有2000万人受胆结石影响;20%的有症状患者会发展为急性胆囊炎(AC)。最近一项单中心研究评估了即时超声检查(POCUS)对检测AC(定义为胆结石加超声墨菲氏征或胆囊周围积液或胆囊壁增厚)的检测特征,结果显示敏感性和特异性分别为87%(95%置信区间[CI]66 - 97)和82%(95%CI 74 - 88)。此前尚无研究评估POCUS用于排除急性结石性胆囊炎的检测特征。

目的

确定POCUS仅发现胆结石对于排除AC是否具有高敏感性、高阴性预测值和低阴性似然比。

方法

我们使用一项关于POCUS检测的前瞻性横断面单中心研究的数据进行分析,采用简化的阳性检测定义——仅存在胆结石——来评估检测特征。临床随访和病理报告用作参考标准。计算检测特征并与标准定义(胆结石加一项次要发现)进行比较。

结果

AC的总体患病率为14%(164例纳入患者中有23例经病理确诊)。简化定义的敏感性为100%(95%CI 85.7 - 100),阴性预测值为100%(95%CI 92.2 - 100),阴性似然比<0.1,而标准定义的敏感性为87%(95%CI 66 - 97%),阴性预测值为97%(95%CI 93 - 99%),阴性似然比为0.16(95%CI 0.06 - 0.5)。

结论

将POCUS检测结果的定义简化为仅胆结石对于排除AC具有出色的敏感性和阴性预测值。这一发现若能在前瞻性研究中得到广泛验证,将证实急诊科患者使用POCUS排除急性结石性胆囊炎的做法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验