Strik Chema, Stommel Martijn W J, Ten Broek Richard P G, van Goor Harry
Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Aug;58(8):792-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000405.
Adhesiolysis during repeat surgery is associated with a high incidence of iatrogenic enterotomies and an increase in postoperative complications. Identification of risk factors would improve preoperative counseling and operating room strategy.
The aim of this study was to identify preoperative risk factors for prolonged and difficult adhesiolysis in a repeat median laparotomy.
This is a prospective cohort study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the risk factors for prolonged and difficult adhesiolysis.
This study was conducted at Radboud University Medical Center.
Patients participating in the LAPAD study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01236625) undergoing an elective repeat median laparotomy were selected.
Detailed data regarding adhesiolysis to gain entry to the abdomen and adhesions underneath the previous incision were gathered by direct observation.
A total of 259 patients underwent a repeat median laparotomy. Adhesiolysis was required for 230 patients (89%); the remaining 29 patients (11%) did not have adhesions underneath the incision. Median adhesiolysis time underneath the midline incision was 10 minutes (interquartile range, 5-25). Seventy-six patients (29%) had grade 1 or grade 2 adhesions; 108 (42%) had grade 3; and 46 (18%) had grade 4. The number of previous laparotomies was the only independent risk factor for prolonged (p ≤ 0.01; 95% CI, 2.5-14.10) and difficult adhesiolysis (p ≤ 0.01; OR, 4.21; 95% CI, 1.74-10.17). History of peritonitis, anatomical location of previous surgery, and the time interval between consecutive median laparotomies did not prolong adhesiolysis.
This study involved retrospective data collection of patients' medical histories. No data were collected on the severity of previous peritonitis.
This study demonstrates that 4 or more previous laparotomies and the presence or history of an intraperitoneal synthetic mesh are independently associated with a longer duration of adhesiolysis needed to gain access to the abdomen. A short time interval between median laparotomies or a history of peritonitis did not prolong the duration of adhesiolysis.
再次手术时进行粘连松解术与医源性肠切开术的高发生率及术后并发症的增加相关。识别危险因素将有助于改善术前咨询和手术室策略。
本研究旨在确定再次正中剖腹手术中粘连松解时间延长及难度增加的术前危险因素。
这是一项前瞻性队列研究。采用单因素和多因素分析来评估粘连松解时间延长及难度增加的危险因素。
本研究在拉德堡德大学医学中心进行。
选择参与LAPAD研究(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01236625)且接受择期再次正中剖腹手术的患者。
通过直接观察收集有关进入腹腔的粘连松解及原手术切口下方粘连的详细数据。
共有259例患者接受了再次正中剖腹手术。230例患者(89%)需要进行粘连松解;其余29例患者(11%)切口下方无粘连。正中切口下方粘连松解的中位时间为10分钟(四分位间距,5 - 25分钟)。76例患者(29%)有1级或2级粘连;108例(42%)有3级粘连;46例(18%)有4级粘连。既往剖腹手术次数是粘连松解时间延长(p≤0.01;95%可信区间,2.5 - 14.10)及粘连松解困难(p≤0.01;比值比,4.21;95%可信区间,1.74 - 10.17)的唯一独立危险因素。腹膜炎病史、既往手术的解剖位置以及连续两次正中剖腹手术之间的时间间隔并未延长粘连松解时间。
本研究涉及对患者病史的回顾性数据收集。未收集既往腹膜炎严重程度的数据。
本研究表明,既往4次或更多次剖腹手术以及存在或有腹膜内合成补片史与进入腹腔所需的粘连松解时间延长独立相关。两次正中剖腹手术之间的时间间隔短或有腹膜炎病史并未延长粘连松解时间。