Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜下腹腔内补片植入术后粘连——问题有多严重?

Adhesions After Laparoscopic IPOM-How Serious Is the Problem?

作者信息

Hoffmann Henry, Kirchhoff Philipp

机构信息

ZweiChirurgen GmbH, Center for Hernia Surgery and Proctology, Basel, Switzerland.

Faculty of Medicine, University Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Mar 26;4:14126. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.14126. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

Although laparoscopic IPOM is still the gold standard in ventral hernia repair, it is subject of a slow but constant decline, while new minimally invasive techniques are increasingly used, as well as open retromuscular repairs. One of the reasons are the intraperitoneal mesh position and its suspected higher risk for creating intraabdominal adhesions, compared to extraperitoneal mesh positions. In potential subsequent operations (e.g., in recurrent ventral hernia repair) adhesions usually must be taken down, which is a known risk factor for complications such as inadvertent enterotomies, surgical site infections and prolonged hospital stay. In this review we evaluate the incidence of intraabdominal adhesions after ventral hernia repair and their potential impact on surgical outcome in subsequent operations. Special attention is paid to the impact of mesh position in developing adhesions.

摘要

尽管腹腔镜腹腔内补片植入修补术(IPOM)仍是腹疝修补的金标准,但它正经历缓慢但持续的衰落,与此同时,新的微创技术以及开放的肌后修补术越来越多地被采用。原因之一是与腹膜外补片位置相比,腹腔内补片的位置及其被怀疑的导致腹腔内粘连的较高风险。在可能的后续手术中(例如复发性腹疝修补),粘连通常必须松解,这是诸如意外肠切开、手术部位感染和住院时间延长等并发症的已知风险因素。在本综述中,我们评估腹疝修补术后腹腔内粘连的发生率及其对后续手术手术结果的潜在影响。特别关注补片位置对粘连形成的影响。

相似文献

1
Adhesions After Laparoscopic IPOM-How Serious Is the Problem?
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Mar 26;4:14126. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.14126. eCollection 2025.
2
S041-Trends and short-term outcomes of three approaches to minimally invasive repair of small ventral hernias. An ACHQC analysis.
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4885-4894. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09629-5. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
4
Adhesiolysis-Related Challenges for Laparoscopic Procedures after Ventral Hernia Repair with Intraperitoneal Mesh.
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2019 Jan-Feb;114(1):39-47. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.114.1.39.
8
The Comparison of eTEP and IPOM in Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2022 Jan 17;32(2):252-258. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001035.
10
Clinical outcomes and costs of retromuscular and intraperitoneal onlay mesh techniques in robotic incisional hernia repair.
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2850-2856. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10776-0. Epub 2024 Apr 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical Approach and Long-Term Recurrence After Ventral Hernia Repair.
JAMA Surg. 2024 Sep 1;159(9):1019-1028. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.1696.
2
Does intraperitoneal mesh increase the risk of bowel obstruction? A nationwide French analysis.
Hernia. 2024 Apr;28(2):419-426. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02885-x. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
6
Incidence, risk factors, and burden of incisional hernia repair after abdominal surgery in France: a nationwide study.
Hernia. 2023 Aug;27(4):861-871. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02825-9. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
7
The incidence and impact of enterotomy during laparoscopic and robotic ventral hernia repair: a nationwide readmissions analysis.
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6385-6394. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09867-1. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
8
Anti-adhesive bioresorbable elastomer-coated composite hernia mesh that reduce intraperitoneal adhesions.
Biomaterials. 2023 Jan;292:121940. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121940. Epub 2022 Dec 3.
9
Long-term reoperation rate following primary ventral hernia repair: a register-based study.
Hernia. 2022 Dec;26(6):1551-1559. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02645-3. Epub 2022 Jul 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验