• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣植入术的临床情况及当前证据基础

Clinical Aspects and Current Evidence Base for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

作者信息

Grunau Gilat Linn, Blanke Philipp, Leipsic Jonathon

机构信息

Department of Medical Imaging, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

J Thorac Imaging. 2015 Nov;30(6):341-8. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000166.

DOI:10.1097/RTI.0000000000000166
PMID:26164167
Abstract

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a common disorder that affects nearly 5% of individuals over 75 years of age. Many patients with AS are unable to undergo surgical valve replacement (SAVR) as they are commonly deemed to be of very high risk. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), introduced in 2002, is a new method for treatment of these patients. Computed tomography (CT) is becoming the gold standard imaging modality for preprocedural planning, including assessment of annular size and access. Since 2002, >100,000 procedures have been performed with either a balloon-expandable valve (Edwards SAPIEN valve) or the self-expanding valve (Medtronic CoreValve). A growing body of evidence supporting the effectiveness and safety of TAVI includes the PARTNER trial and the CoreValve pivotal trial. These have found significantly better survival for the TAVI arm compared with SAVR (CoreValve). There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality between TAVI and SAVR, whereas significantly reduced all-cause mortality was observed for TAVI when compared with standard therapy (PARTNER). Paravalvular regurgitation is increased in TAVI compared with SAVR; however, integration of CT into valve selection has shown to improve outcomes. There is conflicting evidence regarding increased risk for stroke after TAVI, and occurrence of conduction disturbances and the need for a pacemaker after TAVI remain a concern. Upcoming trials are focusing on assessing outcomes for use of TAVI in intermediate-operative risk patients. The future will likely include an increased choice of devices, smaller access sites, and further integration of CT for preprocedure planning.

摘要

主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)是一种常见疾病,影响着近5%的75岁以上人群。许多AS患者因通常被认为风险极高而无法接受外科瓣膜置换术(SAVR)。2002年引入的经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)是治疗这些患者的一种新方法。计算机断层扫描(CT)正成为术前规划的金标准成像方式,包括评估瓣环大小和入路。自2002年以来,已经使用球囊扩张瓣膜(爱德华兹SAPIEN瓣膜)或自膨胀瓣膜(美敦力CoreValve)进行了超过10万例手术。越来越多支持TAVI有效性和安全性的证据包括PARTNER试验和CoreValve关键试验。这些试验发现,与SAVR(CoreValve)相比,TAVI组的生存率显著更高。TAVI和SAVR之间的全因死亡率没有显著差异,而与标准治疗相比(PARTNER),TAVI的全因死亡率显著降低。与SAVR相比,TAVI的瓣周反流增加;然而,将CT纳入瓣膜选择已显示可改善预后。关于TAVI后中风风险增加存在相互矛盾的证据,TAVI后传导障碍的发生和起搏器的需求仍然是一个令人担忧的问题。即将进行的试验重点是评估TAVI在中等手术风险患者中的疗效。未来可能会有更多的器械选择、更小的入路部位,以及进一步将CT用于术前规划。

相似文献

1
Clinical Aspects and Current Evidence Base for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术的临床情况及当前证据基础
J Thorac Imaging. 2015 Nov;30(6):341-8. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000166.
2
Midterm clinical outcome following Edwards SAPIEN or Medtronic Corevalve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): Results of the Belgian TAVI registry.爱德华兹SAPIEN或美敦力Corevalve经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后的中期临床结果:比利时TAVI注册研究结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Sep;86(3):528-35. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25999. Epub 2015 May 11.
3
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Compared With Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与低危患者外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 May;9(5):e003326. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003326.
4
Updated clinical indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis: expert opinion of the Italian Society of Cardiology and GISE.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的更新临床适应证:意大利心脏病学会和 GISE 的专家意见。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2018 May;19(5):197-210. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000636.
5
A 3-center comparison of 1-year mortality outcomes between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement on the basis of propensity score matching among intermediate-risk surgical patients.基于中危手术患者的倾向评分匹配,对经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的 1 年死亡率结果进行的 3 中心比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 May;6(5):443-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.01.136.
6
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis: results from an intermediate risk propensity-matched population of the Italian OBSERVANT study.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄:来自意大利 OBSERVANT 研究中危倾向人群的结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 1;167(5):1945-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.05.028. Epub 2012 May 26.
7
Transfemoral aortic valve implantation with the repositionable Lotus valve compared with the balloon-expandable Edwards Sapien 3 valve.使用可重新定位的Lotus瓣膜与球囊扩张式Edwards Sapien 3瓣膜进行经股主动脉瓣植入术的比较。
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Sep 15;195:171-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.05.139. Epub 2015 May 23.
8
Depth of valve implantation, conduction disturbances and pacemaker implantation with CoreValve and CoreValve Accutrak system for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation, a multi-center study.经导管主动脉瓣置换术使用CoreValve和CoreValve Accutrak系统进行瓣膜植入深度、传导障碍及起搏器植入的多中心研究
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Oct 20;176(3):771-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.07.092. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的成本效果比较。
Heart Lung Circ. 2021 Apr;30(4):547-554. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.09.934. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
10
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of severe aortic stenosis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄的比较:随机试验的荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Dec 14;37(47):3503-3512. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw225. Epub 2016 Jul 7.