Owens Brett D, Williams Allison E, Wolf Jennifer M
Bay Pines VA Healthcare System, Bay Pines, FL, USA; Keller Army Hospital, West Point, NY, USA; F. Edward Hebert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Bay Pines VA Healthcare System, Bay Pines, FL, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Nov;24(11):1707-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.04.020. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
Technical advances have allowed arthroscopic rotator cuff repair to supplant open repairs with similar outcomes. However, few data exist to support the theoretical decrease in complications with the arthroscopic technique.
We used the Veterans Administration Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from the entire U.S. Veterans Administration system. We obtained perioperative data of all patients undergoing rotator cuff repair between 2003 and 2008. Single and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate risk factors for perioperative complications associated with rotator cuff surgery.
There were 6975 open rotator cuff repairs and 2918 arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs performed with similar patient age, gender breakdown, body mass index, and comorbidities. Complications occurred in the early postoperative period in 2.1% of the open repair group and 0.9% of the arthroscopic repair group (P < .0001). The prevalence of both superficial and deep wound infection was higher in the open group compared with the arthroscopic group (1% vs. 0.1% superficial, P < .0001; 0.3% vs. 0.1% deep, P = .11). Return to the operating room within the 30-day surveillance period occurred in 1.1% of the open repair patients compared with 0.5% of patients undergoing arthroscopic repairs (P < .0001). -Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the arthroscopic group had a significantly lower risk of complications (P = .0001), a lower rate of superficial infection (P = .0002), a lower incidence of return to the operating room within 30 days (P = .007), and a lower risk of hospital readmission (P < .0001).
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in the veteran population resulted in a lower incidence of perioperative complications compared with open repair.
技术进步已使关节镜下肩袖修复术能够取代开放修复术,且疗效相似。然而,几乎没有数据支持关节镜技术理论上并发症会减少这一观点。
我们使用了来自整个美国退伍军人管理局系统的退伍军人管理局外科质量改进计划数据库。我们获取了2003年至2008年间所有接受肩袖修复术患者的围手术期数据。进行单因素和多因素分析以评估与肩袖手术相关的围手术期并发症的危险因素。
共进行了6975例开放肩袖修复术和2918例关节镜下肩袖修复术,患者年龄、性别分布、体重指数和合并症相似。开放修复组术后早期并发症发生率为2.1%,关节镜修复组为0.9%(P <.0001)。与关节镜组相比,开放组浅表和深部伤口感染的发生率更高(浅表感染:1% 对0.1%,P <.0001;深部感染:0.3% 对0.1%,P =.11)。开放修复患者中1.1%在30天监测期内返回手术室,而关节镜修复患者为0.5%(P <.0001)。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,关节镜组并发症风险显著更低(P =.0001),浅表感染率更低(P =.0002),30天内返回手术室的发生率更低(P =.007),再次入院风险更低(P <.0001)。
与开放修复相比,退伍军人人群中的关节镜下肩袖修复术围手术期并发症发生率更低。