Suppr超能文献

口服降糖药与心力衰竭难题:结局试验的经验与启示

Oral hypoglycemic agents and the heart failure conundrum: Lessons from and for outcome trials.

作者信息

Kappel B A, Marx N, Federici M

机构信息

Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Aachen, Germany.

Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Aug;25(8):697-705. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Jun 18.

Abstract

AIM

Type 2 diabetes is not only an independent risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease but is also associated with a greater incidence of heart failure (HF). The aim of this review is to examine the effects of oral antidiabetic drugs on CV disease and HF.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Trials of anti-diabetic agents are now designed to assess CV safety, but frequently HF is not included as a primary endpoint. However, HF in patients with diabetes is more frequent than other CV events and seems to be underestimated. A burning question is therefore if the most used trial design to monitor CV safety, i.e. non-inferiority, allows clinical translation of trial findings. Available data further suggest that the CV effects of anti-diabetic drugs may be rather class-specific and are only partly due to their glucose-lowering actions. Metformin, recommended as first line in most guidelines, shows positive CV effects while other classes like thiazolidinediones may precipitate HF. Experimental results on the relatively novel dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP IV) inhibitors imply CV protective effects, but the non-inferiority trials published to date show an overall neutral CV outcome and a potential increase in HF by saxagliptin. However, results on sitagliptin of the recently released TECOS indicate that HF is not a class-dependent effect of DPP IV inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

Further basic research and long-term outcome studies to clarify the effects of antidiabetic agents on CV and HF are required so that we can select the optimal antidiabetic therapy for our patients.

摘要

目的

2型糖尿病不仅是心血管疾病的独立危险因素,还与心力衰竭(HF)的更高发病率相关。本综述的目的是研究口服抗糖尿病药物对心血管疾病和心力衰竭的影响。

数据综合

目前抗糖尿病药物试验旨在评估心血管安全性,但心力衰竭通常未被列为主要终点。然而,糖尿病患者中的心力衰竭比其他心血管事件更常见,且似乎被低估。因此,一个亟待解决的问题是,用于监测心血管安全性的最常用试验设计,即非劣效性试验,是否能将试验结果转化为临床应用。现有数据进一步表明,抗糖尿病药物对心血管的影响可能具有相当的类别特异性,且仅部分归因于其降糖作用。在大多数指南中被推荐为一线用药的二甲双胍显示出积极的心血管效应,而噻唑烷二酮类等其他类别药物可能会引发心力衰竭。相对较新的二肽基肽酶IV(DPP IV)抑制剂的实验结果表明具有心血管保护作用,但迄今为止发表的非劣效性试验显示总体心血管结局呈中性,且沙格列汀可能会增加心力衰竭的发生风险。然而,最近发布的TECOS研究中关于西格列汀的结果表明,心力衰竭并非DPP IV抑制剂的类别依赖性效应。

结论

需要进一步开展基础研究和长期结局研究,以阐明抗糖尿病药物对心血管和心力衰竭的影响,以便我们能为患者选择最佳的抗糖尿病治疗方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验