Suppr超能文献

外耳道鳞状细胞癌的治疗:一家三级癌症中心的经验。

Treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of external auditory canal: A tertiary cancer centre experience.

作者信息

Gandhi Ajeet Kumar, Roy Soumyajit, Biswas Ahitagni, Raza Mohd Waseem, Saxena Tripti, Bhasker Suman, Sharma Atul, Thakar Alok, Mohanti Bidhu Kalyan

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.

出版信息

Auris Nasus Larynx. 2016 Feb;43(1):45-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jul 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Carcinoma of external auditory canal (EAC) is a rare disease with variable management strategies and prognosis. We aimed to analyze treatment modalities, prognostic factors and survival outcomes in patients of squamous cell carcinoma of EAC treated at our institution.

METHODS

Forty-three patients of squamous cell carcinoma of EAC were analyzed for clinical presentation, stage, surgical procedures and radiotherapy (RT) modalities employed. Stell and McCormick staging system was used for staging of the patients. Progression free survival (PFS) was estimated by the use of Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. Log rank test was used to assess the impact of prognostic variables on PFS. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox hazard regression model. p value of <0.05 was considered significant for all statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Median age was 56 years (range: 12-84 years). Male to female ratio was 31:12. Stage was T1, T2 and T3 in 2, 17 and 18 patients respectively. Sixteen patients underwent surgery. Thirty-six patients received RT (14 received definitive RT, 11 had post-operative RT and 11 had RT with palliative intent). Eight patients (16%) received chemotherapy (5 received concurrent with RT, 2 had adjuvant and 1 had neo-adjuvant chemotherapy). Nine patients (of 11 patients) achieved a complete response (CR) and 2 achieved a partial response (PR) after surgery plus post-operative RT. Nine patients and 5 patients respectively achieved CR and PR after definitive RT (with or without concurrent chemotherapy). Of the 11 patients who received palliative RT, 2 had very good objective response (>50%) and 7 patients had PR to palliative RT. After a median follow-up of 16 months, median PFS for the entire cohort was 14 months. Two-year PFS rates were 85.7%, 46.9% and 0% for patients treated with surgery and post-operative RT, definitive RT and palliative RT respectively. On univariate analysis, higher stage (p=0.05) and facial nerve palsy at presentation (p=0.0008) were significant predictors of inferior PFS.

CONCLUSION

Patients with carcinoma of EAC present mostly in advanced stage at our centre. Combined higher stage (T3) and facial nerve palsy at presentation portend poorer outcome. Combined modality treatment with surgery and radiotherapy should be advocated and palliative RT remains a reasonable treatment option in patients with advanced incurable disease.

摘要

目的

外耳道癌(EAC)是一种罕见疾病,治疗策略和预后各不相同。我们旨在分析在我院接受治疗的外耳道鳞状细胞癌患者的治疗方式、预后因素和生存结果。

方法

分析43例外耳道鳞状细胞癌患者的临床表现、分期、手术方式和放疗(RT)方式。采用Stell和McCormick分期系统对患者进行分期。采用Kaplan-Meier乘积限法估计无进展生存期(PFS)。采用对数秩检验评估预后变量对PFS的影响。使用Cox风险回归模型进行多变量分析。所有统计分析中,p值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

中位年龄为56岁(范围:12 - 84岁)。男女比例为31:12。分别有2例、17例和18例患者处于T1、T2和T3期。16例患者接受了手术。36例患者接受了放疗(14例接受根治性放疗,11例接受术后放疗,11例接受姑息性放疗)。8例患者(16%)接受了化疗(5例与放疗同时进行,2例接受辅助化疗,1例接受新辅助化疗)。9例患者(共11例)在手术加术后放疗后达到完全缓解(CR),2例达到部分缓解(PR)。9例和5例患者在根治性放疗后(无论是否同时进行化疗)分别达到CR和PR。在接受姑息性放疗的11例患者中,2例有非常好的客观缓解(>50%),7例患者对姑息性放疗有PR。中位随访16个月后,整个队列的中位PFS为14个月。接受手术加术后放疗、根治性放疗和姑息性放疗的患者2年PFS率分别为85.7%、46.9%和0%。单变量分析显示,更高分期(p = 0.05)和就诊时面神经麻痹(p = 0.0008)是PFS较差的显著预测因素。

结论

在我们中心,外耳道癌患者大多处于晚期。就诊时更高分期(T3)和面神经麻痹预示着较差的预后。应提倡手术和放疗的综合治疗方式,对于晚期不可治愈的患者,姑息性放疗仍然是一种合理的治疗选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验