Lieberman Daniel E
Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Curr Sports Med Rep. 2015 Jul-Aug;14(4):313-9. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000168.
An evolutionary perspective helps evaluate the extent to which exercise is medicine and to explain the exercise paradox: why people tend to avoid exercise despite its benefits. Many lines of evidence indicate that humans evolved to be adapted for regular, moderate amounts of endurance physical activity into late age. However, because energy from food was limited, humans also were selected to avoid unnecessary exertion, and most anatomical and physiological systems evolved to require stimuli from physical activity to adjust capacity to demand. Consequently, selection never operated to cope with the long-term effects of chronic inactivity. However, because all adaptations involve trade-offs, there is no evolutionary-determined dose or type of physical activity that will optimize health. Furthermore, because humans evolved to be active for play or necessity, efforts to promote exercise will require altering environments in ways that nudge or even compel people to be active and to make exercise fun.
从进化的角度有助于评估运动作为药物的程度,并解释运动的悖论:为什么尽管运动有益,人们却往往避免运动。许多证据表明,人类进化到能够适应在晚年进行规律、适度的耐力体力活动。然而,由于食物中的能量有限,人类也被选择避免不必要的 exertion,并且大多数解剖学和生理系统进化到需要体力活动的刺激来根据需求调整能力。因此,自然选择从未作用于应对长期不活动的影响。然而,由于所有适应都涉及权衡,不存在由进化决定的能优化健康的体力活动剂量或类型。此外,由于人类进化到为了娱乐或生存而保持活跃,促进运动的努力将需要以某种方式改变环境,促使甚至迫使人们保持活跃并让运动变得有趣。