Zhang Qiang, Lian Zhou Yang, Chen Zhen Yu, Wang Zhen, di Chen Chu, An Sheng Li, Gong Wei, Zhi Fa Chao, de Liu Si
From the Department of Gastroenterology (QZ, ZYC, ZW, CDC, WG, FCZ, SDL), Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University; Department of Radiology (ZYL), Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences; and Department of Bio-Statistics (SLA), School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jul;94(27):e1092. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001092.
Tissue biopsy is often not very accurate for the diagnosis of gastric epithelial neoplasia (GEN), and the results differ notably from endoscopic resection (ER) in terms of the pathological diagnosis. The aims of this study were to evaluate the diagnostic performances of biopsy, magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI), and biopsy plus ME-NBI for GEN.This study retrospectively analyzed 101 cases diagnosed as GEN using ER samples. The discrepancies between biopsy and ER, as well as between biopsy plus ME-NBI and ER in the diagnosis of GEN were evaluated. Factors that contributed to such discrepancies were analyzed. The sensitivity and specificity of biopsy and ME-NBI for the diagnosis of high-grade neoplasia (HGN) were determined.The discrepancy in the pathological diagnosis between biopsy and ER was 39.6% for GEN and 54.2% for HGN. The discrepancy between biopsy combined with ME-NBI and ER was 15.9% for GEN and 10.2% for HGN. Factors that undermined the diagnostic accuracy of biopsy included the lesion size (≤10 mm, odds ratio [OR] 1; 10-20 mm, OR 0.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1-0.7; >20 mm, OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.1-2.1, P = 0.03) and the number of biopsy fragments (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.8, P = 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity for HGN were 45.8% (33.7%-58.3%) and 100% (87.5%-100%) for biopsy, and 88.1% (77.5%-94.1%) and 92.9% (81.0%-97.5%) for ME-NBI, respectively.In conclusion, biopsy-based diagnoses for GEN should be interpreted with caution. Biopsy combined with ME-NBI can contribute to the diagnosis of GEN, which improves diagnostic consistency with pathological result of ER specimens.
组织活检对于胃上皮肿瘤(GEN)的诊断往往不太准确,其结果在病理诊断方面与内镜切除(ER)显著不同。本研究的目的是评估活检、窄带成像放大内镜(ME-NBI)以及活检联合ME-NBI对GEN的诊断性能。本研究回顾性分析了101例经ER样本诊断为GEN的病例。评估了活检与ER之间以及活检联合ME-NBI与ER在GEN诊断中的差异。分析了导致这种差异的因素。确定了活检和ME-NBI对高级别肿瘤(HGN)诊断的敏感性和特异性。活检与ER在GEN病理诊断上的差异为39.6%,在HGN中为54.2%。活检联合ME-NBI与ER在GEN中的差异为15.9%,在HGN中为10.2%。影响活检诊断准确性的因素包括病变大小(≤10毫米,比值比[OR]1;10 - 20毫米,OR 0.2,95%置信区间[CI]0.1 - 0.7;>20毫米,OR 0.5,95% CI 0.1 - 2.1,P = 0.03)和活检组织块数量(OR 0.6,95% CI 0.5 - 0.8,P = 0.001)。活检对HGN的敏感性和特异性分别为45.8%(33.7% - 58.3%)和100%(87.5% - 100%),ME-NBI对HGN的敏感性和特异性分别为88.1%(77.5% - 94.1%)和92.9%(81.0% - 97.5%)。总之,基于活检的GEN诊断应谨慎解读。活检联合ME-NBI有助于GEN的诊断,提高与ER标本病理结果的诊断一致性。