Suppr超能文献

白光内镜检查与窄带成像放大内镜检查对早期胃癌诊断效能的比较:一项荟萃分析

Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of white light endoscopy and magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging for early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhang Qiang, Wang Fei, Chen Zhen-Yu, Wang Zhen, Zhi Fa-Chao, Liu Si-De, Bai Yang

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southen Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Gastric Cancer. 2016 Apr;19(2):543-552. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0500-5. Epub 2015 Apr 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) is widely used in gastroscopy, especially in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the diagnostic efficacy of white light imaging (WLI) and that of ME-NBI for early gastric cancer.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify studies which met the inclusion criteria. A random-effects model was used to calculate overall sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to assess the diagnostic efficacy of WLI and ME-NBI in early gastric cancer. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the stability of the results.

RESULTS

Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, and included 1724 patients and 2153 lesions. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for the diagnosis of early gastric cancer using WLI were 0.48 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.39-0.57; I (2) = 78.6 %], 0.67 (95 % CI 0.62-0.71; I (2) = 81.9 %), and 0.62, respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC using ME-NBI were 0.83 (95 % CI 0.79-0.87; I (2) = 79.8 %), 0.96 (95 % CI 0.95-0.97; I (2) = 89.3 %), and 0.96, respectively. The studies showed a high degree of heterogeneity. Further sensitivity analysis was mainly performed for the studies of small lesions (mean size 10 mm or less) and the studies with a the score of 12 points or greater in the literature quality assessment, and the AUCs for ME-NBI for diagnosis of early gastric cancer were between 0.93 and 0.98, which suggested that the diagnostic value was still high and stable.

CONCLUSION

Compared with WLI, ME-NBI can effectively diagnose early gastric cancer.

摘要

目的

窄带成像放大内镜(ME-NBI)在胃镜检查中广泛应用,尤其用于早期胃癌的诊断。本荟萃分析旨在比较白光成像(WLI)和ME-NBI对早期胃癌的诊断效能。

方法

检索PubMed/MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆,以识别符合纳入标准的研究。采用随机效应模型计算总体敏感性、特异性和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC),以评估WLI和ME-NBI对早期胃癌的诊断效能。进行敏感性分析以评估结果的稳定性。

结果

10项研究符合纳入标准,共纳入1724例患者和2153个病变。使用WLI诊断早期胃癌的合并敏感性、特异性和AUC分别为0.48[95%置信区间(CI)0.39 - 0.57;I² = 78.6%]、0.67(95%CI 0.62 - 0.71;I² = 81.9%)和0.62。使用ME-NBI的合并敏感性、特异性和AUC分别为0.83(95%CI 0.79 - 0.87;I² = 79.8%)、0.96(95%CI 0.95 - 0.97;I² = 89.3%)和0.96。这些研究显示出高度的异质性。进一步的敏感性分析主要针对小病变(平均大小10mm或更小)的研究以及文献质量评估得分12分或更高的研究,ME-NBI诊断早期胃癌的AUC在0.93至0.98之间,这表明诊断价值仍然较高且稳定。

结论

与WLI相比,ME-NBI能有效诊断早期胃癌。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验