Zhang Li, Zhou Zhirui, Mei Xin, Yang Zhaozhi, Ma Jinli, Chen Xingxing, Wang Junqi, Liu Guangyu, Yu Xiaoli, Guo Xiaomao
From the Department of Radiation Oncology (LZ, ZZ, XM, ZY, JM, XC, JW, XY, XG); Department of Breast Surgery (GL), Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jul;94(27):e1143. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001143.
There has not been a clear answer about the efficacy of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for women with early-stage breast cancer.The aim of this meta-analysis was to summarize the available evidence comparing the efficacy and safety of IORT with those of whole-breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for women with early-stage breast cancer.MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to October 2014. Two authors independently conducted the literature selection and data extraction.Studies that compared IORT with whole-breast EBRT were included in the systematic review. IORT was defined as a single dose of irradiation to the tumor bed during breast-conserving surgery rather than whole-breast irradiation.Qualities of RCTs were evaluated according to the PEDro scale. Qualities of non-RCTs were evaluated according to the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). The risk ratios (RRs) of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, overall mortality, breast cancer mortality, non-breast cancer mortality, and distant metastasis were pooled using a random-effects model.Four studies with 5415 patients were included in this meta-analysis, including 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 2 non-RCTs. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was significantly higher in patients with IORT compared to those with whole-breast EBRT (RR 2.83, 95% CI 1.23-6.51), but with significant heterogeneity (I = 58.5%, P = 0.065). Comparing IORT with whole-breast EBRT, the pooled RRs for overall mortality, breast cancer mortality, non-breast cancer mortality, and distant metastasis were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.66-1.17), 1.20 (95% CI: 0.77-1.86), 0.76 (95% CI: 0.44-1.31), and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.61-1.49), respectively.IORT had a significantly higher risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence than whole-breast EBRT. Overall mortality did not differ significantly. IORT should be used in conjunction with the prudent selection of suitable patients. It is imperative to identify women with a low risk of local recurrence.
对于早期乳腺癌女性患者,术中放疗(IORT)的疗效尚无明确答案。本荟萃分析的目的是总结现有证据,比较IORT与全乳外照射放疗(EBRT)对早期乳腺癌女性患者的疗效和安全性。检索了截至2014年10月的MEDLINE、EMBASE、科学引文索引和考克兰图书馆。两位作者独立进行文献筛选和数据提取。将比较IORT与全乳EBRT的研究纳入系统评价。IORT定义为在保乳手术期间对瘤床进行单次照射,而非全乳照射。根据PEDro量表评估随机对照试验(RCT)的质量。根据非随机研究方法学指数(MINORS)评估非RCT的质量。采用随机效应模型汇总同侧乳腺肿瘤复发、总死亡率、乳腺癌死亡率、非乳腺癌死亡率和远处转移的风险比(RRs)。本荟萃分析纳入了4项研究,共5415例患者,包括2项随机对照试验(RCT)和2项非RCT。与接受全乳EBRT的患者相比,接受IORT的患者同侧乳腺肿瘤复发率显著更高(RR 2.83,95%CI 1.23 - 6.51),但存在显著异质性(I = 58.5%,P = 0.065)。比较IORT与全乳EBRT,总死亡率、乳腺癌死亡率、非乳腺癌死亡率和远处转移的合并RRs分别为0.88(95%CI:0.66 - 1.17)、1.20(95%CI:0.77 - 1.86)、0.76(95%CI:0.44 - 1.31)和0.95(95%CI:0.61 - 1.49)。IORT同侧乳腺肿瘤复发风险显著高于全乳EBRT。总死亡率无显著差异。IORT应与谨慎选择合适患者相结合使用。识别局部复发风险低的女性患者至关重要。