Bonadio William, Brazg Jared, Telt Nadya, Pe Marybelle, Doss Ferrin, Dancy Leah, Alvarado Maili
Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York.
J Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;49(5):597-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.04.009. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
There is controversy regarding whether in-hospital time delay to appendectomy in children with appendicitis affects risk for perforation.
Our aim was to evaluate the impact of time delay from emergency department (ED) presentation to operating room (OR) appendectomy on rates of developing appendiceal perforation in children who present with computed tomography (CT)-confirmed, uncomplicated (no radiographic evidence of perforation) appendicitis.
We conducted a retrospective case review of 248 consecutive children aged ≤18 years with CT-confirmed uncomplicated appendicitis during a 4-year period.
There were 149 males and 99 females, all received subsequent appendectomy. Despite all receiving ED parenteral antibiotic therapy, 54 (22%) developed in-hospital appendiceal perforation (surgeon operative observation or pathologist histologic analysis). No patient developed perforation when appendectomy was performed within 9 h after ED presentation; the rate of perforation was approximately sixfold greater in those with in-hospital delay >9 h (25%) vs. ≤9 h (4.6%). The rate of developing perforation increased to 21% during hours 9-24, and 41% after 24 h. Regression analysis showed three factors were significantly associated with developing perforation: longer mean time delay from ED presentation to OR appendectomy, presence of fever, and presence of an appendicolith. The risk for developing perforation increased by 1.10 for each hour of time delay from ED presentation to OR appendectomy; the estimated odds ratios for developing perforation per interval of in-hospital delay were 2.05 at 8 h, 4.22 at 16 h, and 8.67 at 24 h.
Increasing in-hospital time delay from ED presentation to OR appendectomy is associated with increased risk for developing appendiceal perforation in children who present with CT-documented uncomplicated appendicitis. Risk is approximately sixfold greater in those who experience delay >9 h vs. those whose delay is ≤9 h. Antibiotic therapy does not reliably prevent progression of the disease. Appendectomy should be considered an urgent procedure to maximize outcomes and prevent complications associated with appendix perforation.
阑尾炎患儿行阑尾切除术的院内时间延迟是否会影响穿孔风险存在争议。
我们的目的是评估从急诊科就诊到手术室行阑尾切除术的时间延迟对经计算机断层扫描(CT)确诊为非复杂性(无穿孔影像学证据)阑尾炎患儿发生阑尾穿孔率的影响。
我们对4年间248例年龄≤18岁、CT确诊为非复杂性阑尾炎的连续患儿进行了回顾性病例分析。
其中男性149例,女性99例,均接受了阑尾切除术。尽管所有患儿均接受了急诊科胃肠外抗生素治疗,但仍有54例(22%)发生了院内阑尾穿孔(由外科医生手术观察或病理学家组织学分析确诊)。在急诊科就诊后9小时内行阑尾切除术的患儿无1例发生穿孔;院内延迟>9小时的患儿穿孔率(25%)约为延迟≤9小时患儿(4.6%)的6倍。在9至24小时内穿孔率增至21%,24小时后增至41%。回归分析显示,有三个因素与发生穿孔显著相关:从急诊科就诊到手术室行阑尾切除术的平均时间延迟较长、发热以及存在阑尾粪石。从急诊科就诊到手术室行阑尾切除术每延迟1小时,发生穿孔的风险增加1.10;院内延迟各时间段发生穿孔的估计比值比在8小时时为2.05,16小时时为4.22,24小时时为8.67。
对于CT证实为非复杂性阑尾炎的患儿,从急诊科就诊到手术室行阑尾切除术的院内时间延迟增加与阑尾穿孔风险增加相关。延迟>9小时的患儿发生穿孔的风险约为延迟≤9小时患儿的6倍。抗生素治疗不能可靠地预防疾病进展。应将阑尾切除术视为紧急手术,以实现最佳治疗效果并预防与阑尾穿孔相关的并发症。