• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术时机对阑尾切除术结局的影响:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

The impact of timing on outcomes in appendicectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephens Green Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

World J Emerg Surg. 2024 Jun 14;19(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13017-024-00549-4.

DOI:10.1186/s13017-024-00549-4
PMID:38877592
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11177546/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Appendicectomy remains the standard treatment for appendicitis. There is a lack of clarity on the timeframe in which surgery should be performed to avoid unfavourable outcomes.

AIM

To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the impact the (1)time-of-day surgery is performed (2), time elapsed from symptom onset to hospital presentation (patient time) (3), time elapsed from hospital presentation to surgery (hospital time), and (4)time elapsed from symptom onset to surgery (total time) have on appendicectomy outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA-NMA guidelines. The time-of-day which surgery was done was divided into day, evening and night. The other groups were divided into < 24 h, 24-48 h and > 48 h. The rate of complicated appendicitis, operative time, perforation, post-operative complications, surgical site infection (SSI), length of stay (LOS), readmission and mortality rates were analysed.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included with a total of 232,678 patients. The time of day at which surgery was performed had no impact on outcomes. The incidence of complicated appendicitis, post-operative complications and LOS were significantly better when the hospital time and total time were < 24 h. Readmission and mortality rates were significantly better when the hospital time was < 48 h. SSI, operative time, and the rate of perforation were comparable in all groups.

CONCLUSION

Appendicectomy within 24 h of hospital admission is associated with improved outcomes compared to patients having surgery 24-48 and > 48 h after admission. The time-of-day which surgery is performed does not impact outcomes.

摘要

引言

阑尾切除术仍然是治疗阑尾炎的标准方法。对于应该在何时进行手术以避免不良后果,目前还缺乏明确的认识。

目的

进行系统评价和网络荟萃分析,评估手术时间(1)、从症状发作到医院就诊的时间(患者时间)(2)、从医院就诊到手术的时间(医院时间)(3)以及从症状发作到手术的时间(总时间)(4)对阑尾切除术结果的影响。

方法

按照 PRISMA-NMA 指南进行系统评价。手术时间分为白天、傍晚和夜间。其他组分为<24 小时、24-48 小时和>48 小时。分析复杂阑尾炎、手术时间、穿孔、术后并发症、手术部位感染(SSI)、住院时间(LOS)、再入院率和死亡率的发生率。

结果

纳入了 16 项研究,共 232678 名患者。手术时间对结果没有影响。当医院时间和总时间<24 小时时,复杂阑尾炎、术后并发症和 LOS 的发生率显著降低。当医院时间<48 小时时,再入院率和死亡率显著降低。所有组的 SSI、手术时间和穿孔率均无差异。

结论

与入院后 24-48 小时和>48 小时手术的患者相比,入院后 24 小时内进行阑尾切除术与改善结果相关。手术时间对结果没有影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6509/11177546/71ca7bf0ea3e/13017_2024_549_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6509/11177546/6e079ba9f171/13017_2024_549_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6509/11177546/2bd8a02820cf/13017_2024_549_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6509/11177546/0345188316ae/13017_2024_549_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6509/11177546/429e1a427261/13017_2024_549_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6509/11177546/e6c902596a7e/13017_2024_549_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6509/11177546/83620ee96853/13017_2024_549_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6509/11177546/71ca7bf0ea3e/13017_2024_549_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6509/11177546/6e079ba9f171/13017_2024_549_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6509/11177546/2bd8a02820cf/13017_2024_549_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6509/11177546/0345188316ae/13017_2024_549_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6509/11177546/429e1a427261/13017_2024_549_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6509/11177546/e6c902596a7e/13017_2024_549_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6509/11177546/83620ee96853/13017_2024_549_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6509/11177546/71ca7bf0ea3e/13017_2024_549_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of timing on outcomes in appendicectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.手术时机对阑尾切除术结局的影响:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
World J Emerg Surg. 2024 Jun 14;19(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13017-024-00549-4.
2
Single-incision versus conventional multi-incision laparoscopic appendicectomy for suspected uncomplicated appendicitis.单切口与传统多孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗疑似单纯性阑尾炎的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 5;11(11):CD009022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009022.pub3.
3
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
4
Early versus delayed appendicectomy for appendiceal phlegmon or abscess.阑尾蜂窝织炎或脓肿的早期与延迟阑尾切除术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 2;6(6):CD011670. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011670.pub2.
5
Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis.阑尾切除术与抗生素治疗急性阑尾炎的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 29;4(4):CD015038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015038.pub2.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
Abdominal drainage to prevent intraperitoneal abscess after appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.阑尾切除术后放置腹腔引流以预防复杂性阑尾炎术后腹腔脓肿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 11;4(4):CD010168. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010168.pub5.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Interventions to prevent surgical site infection in adults undergoing cardiac surgery.预防接受心脏手术的成人手术部位感染的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 2;12(12):CD013332. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013332.pub2.
10
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical delay in appendicitis among children: the role of social vulnerability.儿童阑尾炎手术延迟:社会脆弱性的作用。
Front Pediatr. 2025 Jul 2;13:1591200. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1591200. eCollection 2025.
2
Diagnostic value of biochemical markers in prediction of perforation in acute appendicitis: a cross-sectional study.生化标志物在预测急性阑尾炎穿孔中的诊断价值:一项横断面研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Sep 17;86(11):6495-6501. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002547. eCollection 2024 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Role of preoperative in-hospital delay on appendiceal perforation while awaiting appendicectomy (PERFECT): a Nordic, pragmatic, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.术前住院等待阑尾切除时发生阑尾穿孔的作用(PERFECT):一项北欧、实用、开放标签、多中心、非劣效性、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2023 Oct 28;402(10412):1552-1561. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01311-9. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
2
Spontaneous Resolution of Uncomplicated Appendicitis may Explain Increase in Proportion of Complicated Appendicitis During Covid-19 Pandemic: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.新冠疫情期间复杂性阑尾炎比例增加可能与非复杂性阑尾炎自发性缓解有关:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2023 Aug;47(8):1901-1916. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07027-z. Epub 2023 May 4.
3
Does the timing of appendectomy affect outcomes and postoperative complications?阑尾切除术的时机是否会影响结局和术后并发症?
Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Jan 25;39(1):90. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05369-2.
4
Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Appendectomy: Trends, Risk Factors and Outcomes. A 15-Year Single-Center Analysis of 2193 Adult Patients.腹腔镜转为开腹阑尾切除术:趋势、风险因素和结局。15 年单中心 2193 例成年患者分析。
World J Surg. 2022 Nov;46(11):2642-2647. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06670-2. Epub 2022 Jul 24.
5
In-hospital delay of surgery increases the rate of complicated appendicitis in patients presenting with short duration of symptoms: a retrospective cohort study.住院手术延迟会增加症状持续时间较短的患者发生复杂性阑尾炎的比率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct;48(5):3879-3886. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-01912-3. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
6
A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Quality of Life of Antibiotic-only Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis: Results of the COMMA Trial.一项评估单纯抗生素治疗急性单纯性阑尾炎的疗效和生活质量的随机临床试验:COMMA 试验结果。
Ann Surg. 2021 Aug 1;274(2):240-247. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004785.
7
Effects of night surgery on postoperative mortality and morbidity: a multicentre cohort study.夜间手术对术后死亡率和发病率的影响:一项多中心队列研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Aug;30(8):678-688. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011684. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
8
Does the time from symptom onset to surgery affect the outcomes of patients with acute appendicitis? A prospective cohort study of 255 patients.症状发作至手术时间是否影响急性阑尾炎患者的结局?255 例患者的前瞻性队列研究。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021 Jul;14(3):361-367. doi: 10.1111/ases.12870. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
9
Computed Tomography for Acute Appendicitis Diagnosis and Confirmation in Men : Trends and Cost Implications.计算机断层扫描在男性急性阑尾炎诊断和确诊中的应用:趋势和成本影响。
Am Surg. 2021 Mar;87(3):364-369. doi: 10.1177/0003134820951483. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
10
Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines.急性阑尾炎的诊断和治疗:WSES 耶路撒冷指南 2020 年更新版。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr 15;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3.