Department of Orthopedic Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, 40447, Taiwan.
Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, 10630, Taiwan.
Int J Surg. 2015 Dec;24(Pt B):131-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.06.075. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
INTRODUCTION: As of now, the role of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of atrophic non-unions is inconclusive. The purpose of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of ESWT and the role of this technology in the treatment of atrophic non-union of femurs. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 22 patients treated between July 1999 and September 2007 in our hospital with ESWT for atrophic non-unions of isthmic femoral shaft fractures that were initially treated surgically using closed reamed nailing procedure. Patients with open fractures, skeletal immaturity, on anti-osteoporotic medications, with infections, pathological fractures, smokers, with systemic disease compromising bone healing, and excessive deformity were excluded from this study. Due to incomplete follow-up one (1) patient who moved abroad after ESTW treatment was not included in this study and as part of the 22-patients cohort. Radiographs were obtained before treatment and once a month after treatment for 12 months. RESULTS: Using ESWT we showed that 14 fractures out of 22 (63.6%) achieved bony union with an average union time of 9.2 months (range 6-13 months). The union rate was 100% (8 of 8 cases) when ESWT was performed within 12 months from closed reamed nailing surgery versus 42.9% (6 of 14 cases) when ESWT was performed after 12 months from initial surgery. The eight (8) patients out of the total 22 patients cohort, who did not achieve bony union after ESWT, received subsequent treatment with bone grafting with augmentative plating surgery and all achieved bony union within 5 months after intervention. CONCLUSION: For patients with atrophic non-unions of femoral shaft fractures, ESWT can be used as an alternative and effective non-invasive method of treatment. ESWT treatment does not negatively influence/compromise previous surgeries and if needed it can be followed by additional surgeries without any complications.
引言:目前,体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)在治疗萎缩性骨不连中的作用尚无定论。本研究旨在探讨 ESWT 的疗效及其在治疗股骨干萎缩性骨不连中的作用。
方法:我们回顾性分析了 1999 年 7 月至 2007 年 9 月在我院接受 ESWT 治疗的 22 例股骨干峡部骨折萎缩性骨不连患者的资料。这些患者最初均采用闭合髓内钉固定术进行手术治疗。本研究排除了开放性骨折、骨骼未成熟、使用抗骨质疏松药物、存在感染、病理性骨折、吸烟者、患有影响骨愈合的全身性疾病以及存在严重畸形的患者。由于随访不完整,有 1 例患者在 ESWT 治疗后移居国外,因此未纳入本研究。22 例患者中有 1 例被排除在外。在治疗前和治疗后 12 个月内,每月拍摄一次 X 线片。
结果:采用 ESWT,我们发现 22 例患者中有 14 例(63.6%)骨折愈合,平均愈合时间为 9.2 个月(6-13 个月)。ESWT 在闭合髓内钉术后 12 个月内进行的愈合率为 100%(8/8 例),而在初次手术后 12 个月后进行的愈合率为 42.9%(6/14 例)。在 ESWT 治疗后未发生骨愈合的 22 例患者队列中的 8 例患者随后接受了植骨加增强板手术治疗,所有患者均在干预后 5 个月内实现了骨愈合。
结论:对于股骨干萎缩性骨不连患者,ESWT 可作为一种替代的、有效的非侵入性治疗方法。ESWT 治疗不会对先前的手术产生负面影响或产生影响,如果需要,可在不产生任何并发症的情况下进行额外的手术。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2013-12
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025-6-24
Chin Med J (Engl). 2019-8-5