Suppr超能文献

带髓内锉扩插入的闭合交锁髓内钉治疗股骨干骨不连的结果。

The outcome of closed, intramedullary exchange nailing with reamed insertion in the treatment of femoral shaft nonunions.

机构信息

Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Jerusalem IL-91120, Israel.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Oct;23(9):653-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181a2a337.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of closed, intramedullary exchange nailing with reamed insertion for the treatment of femoral shaft nonunions previously treated with an intramedullary nail.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic level I trauma center.

PATIENTS

Forty-two patients whose femoral shaft fracture was initially managed with an intramedullary nail, were subsequently treated by closed, intramedullary exchange nailing with reamed insertion for their femoral nonunion in our center. Seven patients had an infected nonunion as proved by intraoperative cultures.

INTERVENTION

Closed, intramedullary exchange nailing with reamed insertion of a larger diameter nail.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Radiographic and clinical evidence of fracture healing.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients (86%) had their fracture heal without further intervention. The average time to achieve union was 4 months after surgery. Of the 6 cases of exchange nailing failure, 3 were aseptic and 3 were septic. All these 6 patients healed after additional procedures. Lack of immediate weight bearing, open fractures, atrophic/oligotrophic nonunions, and infection were associated with treatment failure. A second nail larger by 2 mm or more than the original nail was associated with a higher success rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Closed, intramedullary exchange nailing with reamed insertion for femoral shaft nonunions previously treated with intramedullary nails has proved to be a successful sole procedure in most cases. A nail at least 2 mm larger in diameter than the first nail should be used if possible. Risk factors of treatment failure should alert the surgeon to consider an alternative treatment to closed exchange nailing.

摘要

目的

确定闭合、髓内交锁钉结合扩髓插入治疗先前使用髓内钉治疗的股骨干不愈合的有效性。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

学术一级创伤中心。

患者

42 例患者,其股骨干骨折最初采用髓内钉治疗,随后在我院采用闭合、髓内交锁钉结合扩髓插入治疗股骨干不愈合。7 例患者术中培养证实为感染性不愈合。

干预

闭合、髓内交锁钉结合扩髓插入更大直径的钉。

主要观察指标

骨折愈合的影像学和临床证据。

结果

36 例(86%)患者无需进一步干预即可愈合骨折。术后平均 4 个月达到愈合。在 6 例交锁钉失败中,3 例为无菌性,3 例为感染性。所有这 6 例患者在进一步治疗后均愈合。未能立即负重、开放性骨折、萎缩/寡营养性不愈合和感染与治疗失败相关。比原始钉大 2 毫米或更多的第二根钉与更高的成功率相关。

结论

对于先前使用髓内钉治疗的股骨干不愈合,闭合、髓内交锁钉结合扩髓插入已被证明是一种大多数情况下成功的单一方法。如果可能,应使用直径至少比第一根钉大 2 毫米的钉。治疗失败的危险因素应提醒外科医生考虑替代闭合交锁钉更换的治疗方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验