Gollner Sabine, Govenar Breea, Fisher Charles R, Bright Monika
Department of Marine Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria ; German Center for Marine Biodiversity Research (DZMB), Senckenberg am Meer, Am Südstrand 44, 26382 Wilhelmshaven, Germany ; Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), Ecosystem Studies, Korringaweg 7, 4401 NT Yerseke, The Netherlands.
Biology Department, Rhode Island College, 600 Mt. Pleasant Ave., Providence, Rhode Island 02908, USA.
Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2015 Feb 3;520:57-66. doi: 10.3354/meps11078.
Species with markedly different sizes interact when sharing the same habitat. Unravelling mechanisms that control diversity thus requires consideration of a range of size classes. We compared patterns of diversity and community structure for meio- and macrofaunal communities sampled along a gradient of environmental stress at deep-sea hydrothermal vents on the East Pacific Rise (9° 50' N) and neighboring basalt habitats. Both meio- and macrofaunal species richnesses were lowest in the high-stress vent habitat, but macrofaunal richness was highest among intermediate-stress vent habitats. Meiofaunal species richness was negatively correlated with stress, and highest on the basalt. In these deep-sea basalt habitats surrounding hydrothermal vents, meiofaunal species richness was consistently higher than that of macrofauna. Consideration of the physiological capabilities and life history traits of different-sized animals suggests that different patterns of diversity may be caused by different capabilities to deal with environmental stress in the 2 size classes. In contrast to meiofauna, adaptations of macrofauna may have evolved to allow them to maintain their physiological homeostasis in a variety of hydrothermal vent habitats and exploit this food-rich deep-sea environment in high abundances. The habitat fidelity patterns also differed: macrofaunal species occurred primarily at vents and were generally restricted to this habitat, but meiofaunal species were distributed more evenly across proximate and distant basalt habitats and were thus not restricted to vent habitats. Over evolutionary time scales these contrasting patterns are likely driven by distinct reproduction strategies and food demands inherent to fauna of different sizes.
体型差异显著的物种在共享同一栖息地时会相互作用。因此,要揭示控制生物多样性的机制,就需要考虑一系列不同的体型类别。我们比较了在东太平洋海隆(北纬9°50′)深海热液喷口及邻近玄武岩栖息地沿环境压力梯度采样的小型底栖生物和大型底栖生物群落的多样性模式和群落结构。在高压力的喷口栖息地,小型底栖生物和大型底栖生物的物种丰富度均最低,但在中等压力的喷口栖息地中,大型底栖生物的丰富度最高。小型底栖生物的物种丰富度与压力呈负相关,在玄武岩上最高。在这些热液喷口周围的深海玄武岩栖息地中,小型底栖生物的物种丰富度始终高于大型底栖生物。考虑到不同体型动物的生理能力和生活史特征,不同的多样性模式可能是由这两个体型类别应对环境压力的不同能力所导致的。与小型底栖生物不同,大型底栖生物的适应性可能已经进化,使其能够在各种热液喷口栖息地维持其生理稳态,并在这个食物丰富的深海环境中大量生存。栖息地忠实度模式也有所不同:大型底栖生物物种主要出现在喷口,并且通常局限于这个栖息地,但小型底栖生物物种在邻近和远处的玄武岩栖息地分布更为均匀,因此并不局限于喷口栖息地。在进化时间尺度上,这些截然不同的模式可能是由不同体型动物固有的独特繁殖策略和食物需求驱动的。