Goel Prabudh, Bhatnagar Veereshwar, Das Nibhriti, Kalaivani Mani
Department of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Department of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2015 Jul-Sep;20(3):139-42. doi: 10.4103/0971-9261.159029.
The differentiation between neonatal hepatitis (NH) and extrahepatic biliary atresia (EHBA) is not always possible despite all the currently available diagnostic modalities. In this study, an attempt has been made to evaluate the role of nitric oxide (NO) levels in the peripheral blood to differentiate between the two conditions, one requiring early surgical intervention (EHBA) and the other amenable to conservative medical management (NH).
Twenty patients who presented to the pediatric surgical service, over a 2 years period, with features of neonatal cholestasis were enrolled in the study. The diagnostic workup included documentation of history and clinical examination, biochemical liver function tests, ultrasonography, hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HS), and magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreaticography (MRCP). These patients did not show excretion on HS and intrahepatic ducts on MRCP. Hence, they were subjected to mini-laparotomy and operative cholangiography (OC). The EHBA patients were treated with the Kasai's portoenterostomy procedure, and the extrahepatic ducts were flushed with normal saline in NH patients. All patients were evaluated preoperatively for levels of NO in the peripheral blood by the Greiss reaction spectrophotometrically at 540 nm. Normal values were determined from a cohort of controls. The median (range) levels of NO in patients with EHBA and NH were compared, and the statistical significance of the difference was calculated by applying the Wilcox Rank Sum test. A P = 0.05 was considered as significant.
Of the 20 patients enrolled in the study, 17 patients were treated for EHBA (Group I) and the remaining 3 patients had patent ducts on OC and were thus diagnosed as NH (Group II). The mean age of the patients in Groups I and II was comparable: 2.79 ± 0.75 and 2.67 ± 0.58 months, respectively (P = 0.866). The median NO levels were significantly elevated in each of the two groups as compared to the controls (5.6 μmol/l, range 1.26-11.34 μmol/l); when compared among themselves, the NO levels were significantly higher in Group I, 64.05 μmol/l (range 24.11-89.43 μmol/l), when compared with Group II, 41.72 μmol/l (range 23.53-45.63 μmol/l) (P = 0.022).
The serum levels of NO were found to be significantly higher in patients with EHBA as compared to those with NH. Hence, this may be a useful biochemical marker for the preoperative differentiation of EHBA from NH. However, a larger study is required for establishing the validity of the statistical significance.
尽管有目前所有可用的诊断方法,但新生儿肝炎(NH)和肝外胆道闭锁(EHBA)之间的鉴别并不总是可行的。在本研究中,已尝试评估外周血中一氧化氮(NO)水平在区分这两种情况中的作用,一种需要早期手术干预(EHBA),另一种适合保守药物治疗(NH)。
在两年期间,儿科外科收治的20例具有新生儿胆汁淤积特征的患者纳入本研究。诊断检查包括病史记录和临床检查、生化肝功能检查、超声检查、肝胆闪烁显像(HS)和磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)。这些患者在HS检查中未显示排泄,在MRCP检查中未显示肝内胆管。因此,他们接受了迷你剖腹术和术中胆管造影(OC)。EHBA患者接受了Kasai肝门肠吻合术治疗,NH患者的肝外胆管用生理盐水冲洗。所有患者术前均通过Greiss反应在540nm处用分光光度法评估外周血中NO的水平。从一组对照中确定正常值。比较EHBA和NH患者中NO的中位数(范围)水平,并通过应用Wilcox秩和检验计算差异的统计学意义。P = 0.05被认为具有显著性。
在纳入研究的20例患者中,17例接受了EHBA治疗(第一组),其余3例在OC检查中胆管通畅,因此被诊断为NH(第二组)。第一组和第二组患者的平均年龄相当:分别为2.79±0.75个月和2.67±0.58个月(P = 0.866)。与对照组(5.6μmol/l,范围1.26 - 11.34μmol/l)相比,两组患者的NO中位数水平均显著升高;两组之间比较时,第一组的NO水平显著高于第二组,第一组为64.05μmol/l(范围24.11 - 89.43μmol/l),第二组为41.72μmol/l(范围23.53 - 45.63μmol/l)(P = 0.022)。
发现EHBA患者的血清NO水平显著高于NH患者。因此,这可能是术前区分EHBA和NH的有用生化标志物。然而,需要更大规模的研究来确定统计学意义的有效性。