Suppr超能文献

重大创伤中心启动前后髋部骨折的管理

Management of hip fractures pre- and post-Major Trauma Centre activation.

作者信息

Wong Ken, Rich James, Yip Grace, Loizou Constantinos, Hull Peter

机构信息

Orthopaedic Trauma Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.

Cambridge University Medical School, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Injury. 2015 Oct;46(10):1975-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.06.030. Epub 2015 Jul 2.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In April 2012, the activation of the regional trauma networks in England was carried out to improve the organisation of trauma care. NHS Trusts that could meet the highest standard of care to complex trauma were designated Major Trauma Centres (MTCs). MTCs receive patients fulfilling certain triage criteria, as well as secondary transfers from nearby trauma units. While complex trauma care is streamlined with this new organisation, the impact this would have on the rest of the trauma workload within MTCs as well as non-MTC hospitals is uncertain. We investigate whether the management of hip fracture cases had suffered as a result of a trauma unit becoming a MTC.

METHODS

Summary data was collated from the National Hip Fracture Database website for the periods of April 2011-April 2012 (the 'pre-MTC' activation period) and April 2012-April 2013 (the 'post-MTC' activation period). As our primary outcome, we compared the time to surgery within 36h between MTCs and non-MTCs for the periods detailed above. Other outcome measures were: reasons for delay to surgery, length of acute stay, proportion of cases meeting Best Practice Tariff criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 54,897 and 55,998 fNOF patients were included for all hospitals in England in the pre- and post-MTC periods respectively. For MTCs, a weighted mean average of 66.6% patients had surgery within 36h in the pre-MTC period versus 71.4% of patients in the post MTC period (p<0.0001). For non-MTCs, a weighted mean average of 70.0% of patients had surgery within 36h in the pre-MTC period versus 73.8% of patients in the post-MTC period (p<0.0001). Non-MTCs in both pre- and post-MTC activation periods were therefore better in percentage of patients receiving surgery within 36h.

DISCUSSION

The data presented suggests that the creation of MTCs has not had a deleterious effect on the management of hip fracture patients. This paper aims to stimulate the important discussion of maintaining a consistently improving standard throughout the spectrum of trauma care, in conjunction with the development of regional Major Trauma Networks.

摘要

引言

2012年4月,英国启动了区域创伤网络,以改善创伤护理的组织工作。能够为复杂创伤提供最高护理标准的国民健康服务信托基金被指定为重大创伤中心(MTCs)。MTCs接收符合特定分诊标准的患者,以及来自附近创伤单元的二次转诊患者。虽然通过这一新组织简化了复杂创伤护理,但这对MTCs以及非MTC医院内其他创伤工作量的影响尚不确定。我们调查了创伤单元成为MTC后,髋部骨折病例的管理是否受到了影响。

方法

从国家髋部骨折数据库网站整理了2011年4月至2012年4月(“MTC前”激活期)和2012年4月至2013年4月(“MTC后”激活期)的汇总数据。作为我们的主要结果,我们比较了上述时间段内MTCs和非MTCs在36小时内进行手术的时间。其他结果指标包括:手术延迟的原因、急性住院时间、符合最佳实践关税标准的病例比例。

结果

在MTC前和MTC后时期,英格兰所有医院分别纳入了54897例和55998例股骨近端骨折(fNOF)患者。对于MTCs,在MTC前时期,加权平均有66.6%的患者在36小时内进行了手术,而在MTC后时期为71.4%的患者(p<0.0001)。对于非MTCs,在MTC前时期,加权平均有70.0%的患者在36小时内进行了手术,而在MTC后时期为73.8%的患者(p<0.0001)。因此,在MTC激活前和激活后的时期,非MTCs在36小时内接受手术的患者百分比方面表现更好。

讨论

所呈现的数据表明,MTCs的创建对髋部骨折患者的管理没有产生有害影响。本文旨在激发关于在整个创伤护理范围内保持持续改进标准的重要讨论,同时结合区域重大创伤网络的发展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验