Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌重建手术后晚期乳房植入物感染的临床和微生物学特征

Clinical and Microbiological Characterization of Late Breast Implant Infections after Reconstructive Breast Cancer Surgery.

作者信息

Franchelli Simonetta, Pesce Marianna, Savaia Serena, Marchese Anna, Barbieri Ramona, Baldelli Ilaria, De Maria Andrea

机构信息

1 SC Chirurgia Plastica e Ricostruttiva, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST , Genoa, Italy .

2 Sezione di Microbiologia DISC, University of Genoa , Genoa, Italy .

出版信息

Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015 Oct;16(5):636-44. doi: 10.1089/sur.2014.146. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Implant infections represent a relevant problem after immediate breast cancer reconstruction. In addition to difficulties in distinguishing early infections from other post-surgical complications (such as hematoma, seroma, and liponecrosis) late breast implant infections still represent a grey area of our knowledge with regards to heir definition and management. To address this issue, we prospectively monitored breast cancer patients at their center.

METHODS

Between February 1, 2009, and May 31, 2013, we enrolled all patients undergoing breast implant reconstruction or expander-to-prosthesis substitution. Patients without at least 6 mo of post-operative observation were excluded. We collected data from patient records including age, days from surgery (DFS), chemotherapy/radiotherapy, infecting microorganism, type of implant, antibiotic management and eventual implant removal. Sixty days from surgery were defined as the clinical threshold between early and late infection. Infections were further classified according to a graded scale into possible, probable and microbiologically proved.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight infections were recorded out of 766 surgical procedures (10.2%). Fifty-three (67%) cases occurred early ≤60 DFS, and 25 (33%) occurred late (i.e., beyond 60 d). By defining infection types as possible, probable or proved, the majority of late infections were classified as proved (84%) compared with 56% of early infections (p=0.0014). Microbiological isolate distribution was similar in proved early infections compared with proved late infections. Among late infections, a delayed occurrence was observed after prosthesis placement compared with expander insertion. Late infections were fraught with lower treatment success rates (12% vs. 41%, p=0.009).

CONCLUSION

Late infection represents a consistent proportion of infections after immediate breast implant reconstruction or prosthesis placement and bear lower chance of salvage after treatment. An increased attention is warranted to improve prevention and treatment strategies.

摘要

背景

即刻乳腺癌重建术后植入物感染是一个相关问题。除了难以将早期感染与其他术后并发症(如血肿、血清肿和脂肪坏死)区分开来之外,晚期乳房植入物感染在其定义和管理方面仍是我们知识中的一个灰色地带。为了解决这个问题,我们在本中心对乳腺癌患者进行了前瞻性监测。

方法

在2009年2月1日至2013年5月31日期间,我们纳入了所有接受乳房植入物重建或扩张器置换为假体的患者。排除术后观察时间不足6个月的患者。我们从患者记录中收集数据,包括年龄、手术后天数(DFS)、化疗/放疗、感染微生物、植入物类型、抗生素治疗及最终的植入物取出情况。手术60天被定义为早期和晚期感染的临床界限。感染根据分级量表进一步分为可能、很可能和微生物学证实三类。

结果

766例手术中有78例感染(10.2%)。53例(67%)病例发生在早期(DFS≤60天),25例(33%)发生在晚期(即超过60天)。将感染类型定义为可能、很可能或证实,大多数晚期感染被归类为证实(84%),而早期感染为56%(p = 0.0014)。在证实的早期感染与证实的晚期感染中,微生物分离株分布相似。在晚期感染中,与扩张器植入相比,假体植入后观察到延迟发生。晚期感染的治疗成功率较低(12%对41%,p = 0.009)。

结论

晚期感染在即刻乳房植入物重建或假体植入术后感染中占相当比例,治疗后挽救的机会较低。需要更加关注以改进预防和治疗策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验