Oklahoma State University
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Mar;8(2):187-9. doi: 10.1177/1745691612443829.
I argue in this comment that Hunt's analysis of the intelligence of nations is smarter than it is wise. It is based on too narrow a conception of intelligence. It also conflates correlation and causation with regard to the relation between IQ and socially defined success, both individual and familial. I suggest that a better approach might be to compare nations as well for their creativity and wisdom.
我在这条评论中认为,亨特对民族智力的分析在聪明才智上超过了明智。它基于对智力的过于狭隘的概念。它还混淆了智商与社会定义的成功之间的相关性和因果关系,无论是个人还是家庭。我认为,一种更好的方法可能是比较各国的创造力和智慧。