Suppr超能文献

临终关怀使用模式的地域差异。

Geographic Variation of Hospice Use Patterns at the End of Life.

机构信息

1 Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale University School of Public Health , New Haven, Connecticut.

2 Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale Cancer Center and Yale University School of Medicine , New Haven, Connecticut.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2015 Sep;18(9):771-80. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0425. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about state-level variation in patterns of hospice use, an important indicator of quality of care at the end of life. Findings may identify states where targeted efforts for improving end-of-life care may be warranted.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to characterize the state-level variation in patterns of hospice use among decedents and to examine state, county, and individual factors associated with these patterns.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of Medicare fee-for-service decedents. The primary outcome measures were state-level hospice use during the last 6 months of life and the state's proportion of hospice users with very short hospice enrollment (≤7 days), very long hospice enrollment (≥180 days), and hospice disenrollment prior to death.

RESULTS

In 2011, the percentage of decedents who used hospice in the last 6 months of life nationally was 47.1%, and varied across states from 20.3% in Alaska to 60.8% in Utah. Hospice utilization patterns also varied by state, with the percentage of hospice users with very short hospice enrollment ranging from 23.0% in the District of Columbia to 39.9% in Connecticut. The percentage of very long hospice use varied from 5.7% in Connecticut to 15.9% in Delaware. The percentage of hospice disenrollment ranged from 6.2% in Hawaii to 19.0% in the District of Columbia. Nationally, state-level hospice use among decedents was positively correlated with the percentage of potentially concerning patterns (including very short hospice enrollment, very long hospice enrollment, and hospice disenrollment) among hospice users (the Pearson correlation coefficient=0.52, p value<0.001). Oregon was the only state in the highest quartile of hospice use and the lowest quartiles of both very short and very long hospice enrollment.

CONCLUSIONS

The percentage of decedents who use hospice may mask important state-level variation in these patterns, including the timing of hospice enrollment, a potentially important component of the quality of end-of-life care.

摘要

背景

临终关怀使用模式的州级差异知之甚少,这是临终关怀质量的一个重要指标。研究结果可能会确定需要有针对性地努力改善临终关怀的州。

目的

我们旨在描述临终关怀使用模式的州级差异,并研究与这些模式相关的州、县和个人因素。

方法

我们对医疗保险按服务收费的死者进行了回顾性分析。主要结局指标是死者在生命的最后 6 个月内的州级临终关怀使用率,以及该州接受临终关怀的患者中非常短期(≤7 天)、非常长期(≥180 天)和在死前退出临终关怀的比例。

结果

2011 年,全国在生命的最后 6 个月内使用临终关怀的死者比例为 47.1%,各州之间差异很大,从阿拉斯加的 20.3%到犹他州的 60.8%。临终关怀使用模式也因州而异,接受非常短期临终关怀的患者比例从哥伦比亚特区的 23.0%到康涅狄格州的 39.9%不等。非常长期使用临终关怀的比例从康涅狄格州的 5.7%到特拉华州的 15.9%不等。退出临终关怀的比例从夏威夷的 6.2%到哥伦比亚特区的 19.0%不等。全国范围内,死者的州级临终关怀使用率与临终关怀使用者中潜在问题模式(包括非常短期的临终关怀登记、非常长期的临终关怀登记和临终关怀退出)的比例呈正相关(Pearson 相关系数=0.52,p 值<0.001)。俄勒冈州是临终关怀使用率最高的州,也是非常短期和非常长期临终关怀登记率最低的州。

结论

使用临终关怀的死者比例可能掩盖了这些模式的重要州级差异,包括临终关怀登记的时间,这是临终关怀质量的一个重要组成部分。

相似文献

1
Geographic Variation of Hospice Use Patterns at the End of Life.
J Palliat Med. 2015 Sep;18(9):771-80. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0425. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
2
End-of-Life Care Intensity and Hospice Use: A Regional-level Analysis.
Med Care. 2016 Jul;54(7):672-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000547.
3
Effects of Medicare advantage on patterns of end-of-life care among Medicare decedents.
Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug;57(4):863-871. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13953. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
5
Family Perspectives on Aggressive Cancer Care Near the End of Life.
JAMA. 2016 Jan 19;315(3):284-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.18604.
6
Place of Death of Individuals with Terminal Cancer: New Insights from Medicare Hospice Place-of-Service Codes.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Sep;64(9):1815-22. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14269. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
8
Has Hospice Use Changed? 2000-2010 Utilization Patterns.
Med Care. 2015 Jan;53(1):95-101. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000256.
9
Managed care, hospice use, site of death, and medical expenditures in the last year of life.
Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(15):1722-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.15.1722.
10
Hospice use among Medicare managed care and fee-for-service patients dying with cancer.
JAMA. 2003 May 7;289(17):2238-45. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.17.2238.

引用本文的文献

1
Variation in Palliative Care Program Performance for Patients With Metastatic Cancer.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2025 Jan;69(1):23-33.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.10.021. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
2
Home Health Care and Hospice Use Among Medicare Beneficiaries With and Without a Diagnosis of Dementia.
J Palliat Med. 2024 Jun;27(6):776-783. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0583. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
3
Intersection of Palliative Care and Hospice Use Among Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer.
J Palliat Med. 2023 Nov;26(11):1474-1481. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0040. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
4
State Regulations and Assisted Living Residents' Potentially Burdensome Transitions at the End of Life.
J Palliat Med. 2023 Jun;26(6):757-767. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0360. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
5
Predicting Hospice Transitions in Dementia Caregiving Dyads: An Exploratory Machine Learning Approach.
Innov Aging. 2022 Aug 11;6(6):igac051. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igac051. eCollection 2022.
6
A national study of disenrollment from hospice among people with dementia.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Oct;70(10):2858-2870. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17912. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
7
Transitions from Home Health to Hospice: The Role of Agency Affiliation.
J Palliat Med. 2022 Jun;25(6):873-879. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0390. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
8
Primary care physician continuity, survival, and end-of-life care intensity.
Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug;57(4):853-862. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13869. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
9
Regional variations in geographic access to inpatient hospices and Place of death: A Population-based study in England, UK.
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 17;15(4):e0231666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231666. eCollection 2020.
10
Hospice Utilization in the United States: A Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Cancer and Noncancer Deaths.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Apr;68(4):783-793. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16294. Epub 2019 Dec 27.

本文引用的文献

2
Has Hospice Use Changed? 2000-2010 Utilization Patterns.
Med Care. 2015 Jan;53(1):95-101. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000256.
3
Hospice admissions for cancer in the final days of life: independent predictors and implications for quality measures.
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct 1;32(28):3184-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.8817. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
4
A national study of live discharges from hospice.
J Palliat Med. 2014 Oct;17(10):1121-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0595. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
5
Patients surviving six months in hospice care: who are they?
J Palliat Med. 2014 Aug;17(8):899-905. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0512. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
6
National hospice survey results: for-profit status, community engagement, and service.
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Apr;174(4):500-6. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3.
8
Impact of hospice disenrollment on health care use and medicare expenditures for patients with cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Oct 1;28(28):4371-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.1818. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
9
A new era of for-profit hospice care--the Medicare benefit.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 25;360(26):2701-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0902437.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验