Suppr超能文献

一项关于临终关怀机构存活出院情况的全国性研究。

A national study of live discharges from hospice.

作者信息

Teno Joan M, Plotzke Michael, Gozalo Pedro, Mor Vincent

机构信息

1 School of Public Health, Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University , Providence, Rhode Island.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2014 Oct;17(10):1121-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0595. Epub 2014 Aug 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Live discharges from hospice can occur because patients decide to resume curative care, their condition improves, or hospices may inappropriately use live discharge to avoid costly hospitalizations.

OBJECTIVE

Describe the variation, outcomes, and organizational characteristics associated with live discharges.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING/SUBJECTS: Medicare fee-for-service hospice beneficiaries.

MEASUREMENT

Overall rate, timing, and health care transitions of live discharges.

RESULTS

In 2010, 182,172 of 1,003,958 (18.2%) hospice discharges were alive. Hospice rate of live discharges varied by hospice program with interquartile range of 9.5% to 26.4% and by geographic regions with the lowest rate in Connecticut (12.8%) and the highest in Mississippi (40.5%). Approximately 1 in 4 (n=43,889; 24.1%) beneficiaries discharged alive were hospitalized within 30 days. Nearly 8% (n=13,770) had a pattern of hospice discharge, hospitalization, and hospice readmission. These latter cases account for $126 million in Medicare reimbursement. Not-for-profit hospice programs had a lower rate of live discharges compared to for-profit programs (14.6% versus 22.4%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-0.91). More mature hospice programs (over 21 years in operation) had lower rates of live discharge compared to programs in operation for 5 years or less (14.2% versus 26.7%; AOR 0.71, 95% CI 0.65-0.77). Small for-profits in operation 5 years or less had a higher live discharge rate than older, for-profit programs (31.5% versus 14.3%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 1 in 5 hospice patients are discharged alive with variation by geographic regions and hospice programs. Not-for-profit hospices and older hospices have lower rates of live discharge.

摘要

背景

临终关怀机构的存活出院可能是因为患者决定恢复治愈性治疗、病情改善,或者临终关怀机构可能不适当地利用存活出院来避免昂贵的住院治疗。

目的

描述与存活出院相关的差异、结局和组织特征。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

设置/研究对象:医疗保险按服务收费的临终关怀受益人。

测量

存活出院的总体发生率、时间和医疗保健过渡情况。

结果

2010年,1,003,958例临终关怀出院中有182,172例(18.2%)存活出院。临终关怀机构的存活出院率因机构项目而异,四分位间距为9.5%至26.4%,也因地理区域而异,康涅狄格州的发生率最低(12.8%),密西西比州的发生率最高(40.5%)。约四分之一(n = 43,889;24.1%)存活出院的受益人在30天内住院。近8%(n = 13,770)的患者有临终关怀出院、住院和临终关怀再入院的情况。后一种情况的医疗保险报销金额达1.26亿美元。非营利性临终关怀项目的存活出院率低于营利性项目(14.6%对22.4%;调整优势比[AOR]为0.84,95%置信区间[CI]为0.77 - 0.91)。运营超过21年的更成熟的临终关怀项目的存活出院率低于运营5年或以下的项目(14.2%对26.7%;AOR为0.71,95%CI为0.65 - 0.77)。运营5年或以下的小型营利性机构的存活出院率高于较老的营利性项目(31.5%对14.3%,p < 0.001)。

结论

约五分之一的临终关怀患者存活出院,不同地理区域和临终关怀项目存在差异。非营利性临终关怀机构和较老的临终关怀机构的存活出院率较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验