Ceppa Eugene P, Roch Alexandra M, Cioffi Jessica L, Sharma Neil, Easler Jeffrey J, DeWitt John M, House Michael G, Zyromski Nicholas J, Nakeeb Attila, Schmidt C Max
Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Surgery. 2015 Oct;158(4):937-44; discussion 944-5. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
It is unclear whether the duct involvement subtypes of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), ie, main (MD), mixed (MT), and branch (BD), confer any survival advantage when invasive IPMN occurs. We hypothesized that invasive MT-IPMN was associated with a better prognosis than invasive MD-IPMN.
A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed of patients who underwent resection for IPMN at a single academic institution from 1992 to 2014. Characterization of IPMN subtype was assessed on final operative pathology. Statistics included univariate analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and Cox regression for independent predictors of increased survival.
Of 390 patients eligible for study, 74 had invasive IPMN (IPMC). Of these, 71 patients had complete data and were included in the analysis (17 MD-IPMC, 39 MT-IPMC, and 15 BD-IPMC). Median follow-up was 20 months (range, 2-174). MT-IPMC was associated with significantly greater overall survival (OS) (47 months) compared with MD-IPMC (12 months) (P = .049), but not with BD-IPMC (44 months) (P = .67). Multivariate Cox regression yielded a family history of pancreatic cancer, absence of jaundice, N0 status, negative margins, absence of lymphovascular invasion, and MT subtype as independent predictors of greater OS (P = .035, .015, .013, .036, .045, .043, respectively). No characteristic of IPMN (including MD diameter, solid component/mural nodule) was predictive of OS.
MT-IPMC appeared to be associated with a greater OS compared with pure MD-IPMC. This begs the question of a different underlying biology of MT-IPMN and argues against classification of all main duct involved IPMN into a single category.
导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMN)的导管受累亚型,即主胰管型(MD)、混合型(MT)和分支胰管型(BD),在发生浸润性IPMN时是否具有生存优势尚不清楚。我们假设浸润性MT-IPMN比浸润性MD-IPMN预后更好。
对1992年至2014年在单一学术机构接受IPMN切除术的患者进行前瞻性维护数据库的回顾性研究。IPMN亚型的特征在最终手术病理上进行评估。统计分析包括单因素分析、Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和Cox回归以确定生存增加的独立预测因素。
在390例符合研究条件的患者中,74例发生浸润性IPMN(IPMC)。其中,71例患者有完整数据并纳入分析(17例MD-IPMC、39例MT-IPMC和15例BD-IPMC)。中位随访时间为20个月(范围2 - 174个月)。与MD-IPMC(12个月)相比,MT-IPMC的总生存期(OS)显著更长(47个月)(P = .049),但与BD-IPMC(44个月)相比无显著差异(P = .67)。多因素Cox回归显示胰腺癌家族史、无黄疸、N0状态、切缘阴性、无淋巴血管侵犯和MT亚型是OS更长的独立预测因素(P分别为.035、.015、.013、.036、.045、.043)。IPMN的任何特征(包括MD直径、实性成分/壁结节)均不能预测OS。
与单纯MD-IPMC相比,MT-IPMC似乎具有更长的OS。这引发了关于MT-IPMN潜在生物学特性不同的问题,并反对将所有主胰管受累的IPMN归为同一类别。