Abrams Paul, Paty Jean, Martina Reynaldo, Newgreen Donald T, van Maanen Rob, Paireddy Asha, Kuipers-deGroot Trudy, Ridder Arwin
Southmead Hospital, Bristol Urological Institute, Southmead Road, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Quintiles, Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, New York.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Aug;35(6):743-9. doi: 10.1002/nau.22800. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
This observational study compared data values, reliability, consistency and compliance collected by electronic and paper diaries of differing durations.
Subjects ≥18 years with overactive bladder (OAB) on stable antimuscarinic treatment for ≥12 weeks were assigned to one of five, 15-week diary schedules in this randomized, parallel-group observational study. Sample size was sufficient to assess reliability and consistency of diary data with adequate precision. Reliability was assessed via intraclass correlation coefficients, variability with ANCOVAs, and consistency using Cronbach's alpha.
Demographic characteristics of randomized subjects were representative of OAB trial populations. For mean volume voided, reliability was comparable across diary groups. For incontinence, reliability improved with increasing diary duration. For micturition frequency, electronic 7-day diary results had highest reliability and lowest variability. Lowest overall reliability was observed in the 3-day paper diary. Consistency was highest in the electronic continuous groups; Cont A (daily measurements throughout the study period [fully Continuous]) and Cont B (daily measurements for some but not all endpoints of interest [Partially Continuous]). Compliance was generally high; across groups ≥90% of diaries had at least one entry per day. There was no significant change in average micturition frequency with diary duration, suggesting no diary fatigue. One-third of subjects in the electronic Cont B group also reported micturitions as incontinence when they only needed to report incontinence; they also reported lowest satisfaction with the study. The electronic 7-day and electronic Cont A schedules (who reported incontinence and micturitions throughout the study) had lowest residual errors.
For future OAB trials, 7-day or continuous electronic diaries may improve accuracy and reliability of micturition and incontinence frequency data compared with shorter collection periods and paper diaries. Neurourol. Urodynam. 35:743-749, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
本观察性研究比较了不同时长的电子日记和纸质日记所收集的数据值、可靠性、一致性及依从性。
在这项随机、平行组观察性研究中,将年龄≥18岁、正在接受稳定抗毒蕈碱治疗≥12周的膀胱过度活动症(OAB)患者分配到五个15周日记计划中的一个。样本量足以精确评估日记数据的可靠性和一致性。通过组内相关系数评估可靠性,通过协方差分析评估变异性,使用克朗巴哈系数评估一致性。
随机分组患者的人口统计学特征代表了OAB试验人群。对于平均排尿量,各日记组的可靠性相当。对于尿失禁,可靠性随日记时长增加而提高。对于排尿频率,电子7天日记结果的可靠性最高且变异性最低。在3天纸质日记中观察到总体可靠性最低。电子连续组的一致性最高;连续A组(在整个研究期间每日测量[完全连续])和连续B组(对部分但并非所有感兴趣的终点进行每日测量[部分连续])。依从性普遍较高;各小组中≥90%的日记每天至少有一条记录。平均排尿频率未随日记时长出现显著变化,表明不存在日记疲劳。电子连续B组中有三分之一的受试者在只需报告尿失禁时也将排尿报告为尿失禁;他们对该研究的满意度也最低。电子7天和电子连续A计划(在整个研究期间报告尿失禁和排尿情况)的残留误差最低。
对于未来的OAB试验,与较短收集期和纸质日记相比,7天或连续电子日记可能会提高排尿和尿失禁频率数据的准确性和可靠性。《神经泌尿学与尿动力学》35:743 - 749,2016年。©2015威利期刊公司